This Blog post should give you an idea about how to set a user status based on a system status.
The Business requirement was to set a user status when standard button of 'Set to completed' was used on a business transaction ( screen 1). As per st...
This Blog post should give you an idea about how to read CRM survey question/answers value in ABAP code stored against a business transaction and validate the combinations.
The Business requirement was to convert the CRM Survey XML and read the Q...
1.png2.png4.png6.pngHi Experts,I added the field in the context node with data element type as DATS, but when screen on the screen it is coming as F4 that too with no values. Please help me out, its urgent. Refer below screens for reference.
Hi experts, I have a requirement to use the dynamic search object feature ( as shown in pic 1) to create a 2 search field with 1 field in drop down. I require this functionality in value attribute ( refer pic 2), I tried using the super classes of d...
Hi experts, I have declared a field as radio button and added the same to the view configuration. In the view, the circles of the radio button is half truncated (Please refer the attached screen shot). I tried changing the resolution of the screen a...
Hi Ritesh, I don't know whether this approach is right or wrong. but it worked perfectly well for me. All the fields of Builheader objects are in editable mode now. Thanks Rahul
Hi,I added the above code in the resp method. But while testing it is showing me exception:-500 SAP Internal Server Error ERROR: Dereferencing of the NULL reference (termination: RABAX_STATE)RegardsRahul
Hi Dharmakasi.,I am just using Builheader fields in my custom component view to do some testing on a scenario. I want it to be editable by default. In the attached screen, u will notice that only the first field is editable (as I redefined its Get I ...
Hi Srinivas,I tried the method suggested by you, it worked . Is there any other alternative to do so. Can i group all the attributes make it editable at one go. I don't want to redefine the get i methods of each attribute.ThanksRahul