Skip to Content
Technical Articles

Serverless SAP Fiori Apps in SAP Cloud Platform

In this post, I show-case the latest innovation for web apps in SAP Cloud Platform – hosting them without an approuter. With this new capability of the Launchpad service, you no longer need to deploy backend components to host web apps – which, therefore, run serverless on SAP Cloud Platform.


Now that the HTML5 Application Repository gets more and more popular, I received a couple of questions about whether it is possible to use only one approuter for multiple web apps to lower the total cost of ownership (TCO). The good news is that this can be done fairly easily. The even better news is that you don’t need an approuter at all! The existing Portal subscription and the new Launchpad subscription service already come with an integrated HTML5 application runtime that will allow you to access web apps directly via the Launchpad URL. In this blog post, I will explain how to deploy regular web apps and SAP Fiori apps and let them be managed by SAP Cloud Platform. Fiori Apps can then easily be found by the Content Explorer of the Launchpad service and directly be added to a Launchpad.

The Content Explorer of the Launchpad service detected an available SAP Fiori app automatically and suggests adding it to the SAP Fiori Launchpad.

Old state

Several things need to happen in SAP Cloud Platform to run a web app. For once, the application needs to be hosted somewhere. As I explained in a talk earlier this year, many reasons speak for the HTML5 Application Repository service. Therefore, we need to (a) upload the web app into this repository during the deployment. Next, we need an approuter to (b) redirect incoming traffic to the web app that resides in the repository service. If the web app is an SAP Fiori application, we might have used the Cloud Foundry service “portal” to embed it in an SAP Fiori Launchpad. For this, we needed a (c) deployer application to upload the configuration file to the service instance bound to the approuter. For most apps, there are also destinations involved which point to the backend systems that provide data. So we also need to (d) maintain destination in the SAP Cloud Platform Cockpit. 




d) <Done manually in the SAP Cloud Platform Cockpit>


The architecture of the old approach

For two (b and c) out of these four tasks, we typically leverage the Cloud Foundry tasks, which are Node.js modules. These modules run for a short time and stop once the job is completed. During this time, they consume memory and CPU resources, which has a small (but present) impact on your TCO. The most immense impact on the TCO is caused by the approuter. It runs 24/7 and scales with the complexity and usage of the web app. In many scenarios, developers use even one approuter per web app, which multiplies the TCO.

This also explains why I got asked by multiple developers, whether it’s possible to use a single approuter for multiple SAP Fiori apps. In the next section, I will show you something even better: You’ll be able to serve your web apps with NO backend component at all.

Make your web apps “serverless”

The core idea is quite simple: The SAP Fiori Launchpad itself also a web app that is connected to an HTML5 application runtime. The advantage of that service is that it’s hosted by SAP for you, so you don’t need to manage the HTML5 application runtime, and you can simply consume it.

This post described how you can use the SAP Business Application Studio to create a new SAPUI5 app managed by SAP Cloud Platform out-of-the-box.

The URL of you SAP Fiori Launchpad service typically looks like this:


We can now reuse the approuter of this application and make our web apps accessible under:


As you can see, each web app needs to contain a unique appId, the version, and refer to a service to form this URL – all three values are maintained in the manifest.json . If you want to build such a web app “by hand,” start with a minimal version of this manifest.json file:

  "_version": "1.12.0",
  "": {
    "id": "helloworld",
    "applicationVersion": {
      "version": "1.0.0"
  "": {
    "service": "basic.service"
  "sap.ui5": {
    "dependencies": {
        "minUI5Version": "1.65.0"

Besides this, you need to create service keys for certain Cloud Foundry service instances. These keys are necessary for destinations that are created during the deployment of your application. You can use the following snippet to define the keys and destinations in your mta.yamlfile.

  - name: hello-world-destination-content
      - name: hello-world_uaa
            name: hello-world_uaa-key
      - name: hello-world_html_repo_host
            name: hello-world_html_repo_host-key
      - name: hello-world-destination-service
                - Name: my_service_hello_world_html_repo_host
                  ServiceInstanceName: hello-world_html_repo_host
                  ServiceKeyName: hello-world_html_repo_host-key
                - Authentication: OAuth2UserTokenExchange
                  Name: my_service_uaa_hello_world
                  ServiceInstanceName: hello-world_uaa
                  ServiceKeyName: uaa_hello-world-key
              existing_destinations_policy: update
          content-target: true
      no-source: true


  - name: hello-world-destination-service
    type: org.cloudfoundry.managed-service
      service: destination
      service-name: hello-world-destination-service
      service-plan: lite
  - name: hello-world_html_repo_host
    type: org.cloudfoundry.managed-service
      service: html5-apps-repo
      service-plan: app-host
  - name: hello-world_uaa
    type: org.cloudfoundry.managed-service
      path: ./xs-security.json
      service: xsuaa
      service-plan: application

You can now remove the approuter module from your project as you don’t need it anymore. This helps you a lot to reduce the TCO footprint of your project. In case you defined routes on the approuter ( router/xs-app.json ), you need to copy these routes to the xs-app.json file of your web app. When you do this, you move the route to the URL suffix of the web app. E.g. the URL will be


instead of


To account for this change, you need to switch from absolute to relative URLs in your web app. Most likely you’ll need to make changes to the datasources property in the manifest.json.

"": {
    "dataSources": {
        "mainService": {
            // OLD: "uri": "/v2/Northwind/Northwind.svc/",
            "uri": "v2/Northwind/Northwind.svc/",

You can find the entire sample project on GitHub if you want to clone it from there. Once you run the typical build and deploy commands, you will be able to see your web app listed under “HTML5 Applications” on your subaccount.


The cockpit shows a list of all web apps that are available in this subaccount.

Note: This UI is not available in trial accounts at the moment. You will only be able to see this in production accounts!

Click on the application name to open the web app. You’ll notice that the URL is different than the URL of typical approuter apps because there is not Cloud Foundry application involved here. 

Deploy without a Cloud Foundry task

In the old approach, we used CF modules of type to zip and upload the static web app resources to the HTML5 Application Repository. In the new approach, we will use the native GACD interface to upload the web application directly into the HTML5 Application Repository. This means we don’t need a Cloud Foundry task for b) any longer, and therefore it won’t consume memory and CPU.

For this, we need to make sure the web app is zipped during the build process. This can be achieved in multiple ways, either with a package from npm or with this custom task for the UI5 tooling builder.

Once the zip archive has been created, you just to reference it from the new MTA module:

  - name: hello-world_ui_deployer
    path: .
      - name: hello-world_html_repo_host
          content-target: true
      build-result: resources
        - artifacts:
          name: HTML5Module
          target-path: resources/

Notice that the module type has been changed and that there is no package.json file needed anymore. With this, you reduced the footprint of your overall projects a little more.

Expose SAP Fiori apps in the Content Explorer

In this new approach, we won’t be using the “developer sandbox” of the Fiori Launchpad (aka the Portal service instance) but the actual management UI that comes with the full Launchpad subscription. In other words, we don’t need the service instance in the mta.yaml file, and therefore task c) is also out of the game. We just made the footprint of the project a little bit smaller.

Your Fiori app needs to fulfill the following criteria when you want to make it accessible via the Content Explorer:

  1. Contain an inbound navigation intent in the manifest.
      "": {
          "crossNavigation": {
              "inbounds": {
                  "fe-inbound": {
                      "signature": {
                          "parameters": {},
                          "additionalParameters": "allowed"
                      "semanticObject": "masterDetail",
                      "action": "display",
                      "title": "Available Categories",
                      "subTitle": "",
                      "icon": ""
  2. Include a “” file that includes the manifest.

Redeploy your project after you made these changes. Now, navigate to the management user interface for the Launchpad subscription and go to the Provider Manager. You should see a content provider named “HTML5 Apps“, use the refresh button to sync with the HTML5 Application Repository. You’ll also need to click this button every time when a changed application should be updated on the launchpad site.


The HTML5 Application Repository as a Content Provider

Next, switch over to the Content Manager and choose the tab Content Explorer. You are now able to see your Fiori App and to click the “Add to My Content” button.


The Content Explorer found one SAP Fiori app.


Congrats! You have now removed all Cloud Foundry modules that consume memory and CPU from your project and therefore reduced the footprint of your SAP Cloud Platform SAP Fiori app significantly.


The architecture of the new approach

You can find an entire sample Fiori app in our Multi-Cloud HTML5 Apps Repo on GitHub.

Destinations as code

Infrastructure as code is used to define compute resources in a text file and to provision them automatically when needed. Similarly, this feature can relieve you of configuring the destinations manually in the SAP Cloud Platform Cockpit and automating your development flow.

I recently learned that you can define destinations in a JSON file, similar to the xs-security.json file that we already know. This feature can potentially be used to declutter the destinations on the subaccount level and move them to the service instance-level. At the time of this writing, the managed approach only supports subaccount-level destinations, which can also be created this way. You only need to define the update strategy and the properties of the destinations in a configuration file:

	"init_data": {
		"subaccount": {
			"existing_destinations_policy": "update",
			"destinations": [
					"Name": "Northwind",
					"Description": "Automatically generated Northwind destination",
					"Authentication": "NoAuthentication",
					"ProxyType": "Internet",
					"Type": "HTTP",
					"URL": "",
					"HTML5.DynamicDestination": true
		"instance": {
			"existing_destinations_policy": "update",
			"destinations": []

Do not add credentials in such a file because then you might accidentally include them in the git history of your repo.

And last but not least, you need to include this JSON file in the resource definition of the destination service instance in the mta.yaml file:

  - name: mock-destination
    type: org.cloudfoundry.managed-service
      service-plan: lite
      service: destination
      path: ./destinations.json

More information on this can be found in the documentation.


So task d) from above is not needed any longer either. With this, we got rid of all tasks that required manual work or consumed compute resources to deploy a web app. Hurray!

You can find an entire sample Fiori app in our Multi-Cloud HTML5 Apps Repo on GitHub.


I already mentioned it a couple of times across this post; the most significant advantage of this approach is the reduced footprint that saves you money. But this is, by far, not the only benefit. It also helps you scale your web apps because you won’t need to decide how much memory you want to allocate to the approuter. By reducing the included modules, you can simplify the architecture of the project significantly and, therefore, also reduce the planning overhead when designing such a Fiori App. This simplified architecture also accelerates the deploy time. It now only takes about 30 seconds to deploy a Fiori Application and to create the needed service keys and destinations, whereby it took a few minutes and required manual configuration in the past.


Even though many reasons speak for the new approach, there are also a couple of reasons that speak for an approuter that you is entirely under your control. One reason might be that you prefer to keep the routes on the approuter-level. Or maybe you want to configure or extend the default approuter. It could also make sense to keep the approuter combined with servers written with the Cloud Application Programming Model.


In this post, you have learned:

  • that an approuter is no longer needed to host web apps in SAP Cloud Platform
  • how to let SAP Cloud Platform manage your web apps
  • how to make an SAP Fiori app detectable via the Content Explorer
  • how to define destinations with text files
  • that it can still make sense to use an approuter
You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.
  • Thanks for sharing this Marius, we’ll try this approach for our CAP + Fiori apps. I have one question though, what do you mean with this statement:

     It could also make sense to keep the approuter combined with servers written with the Cloud Application Programming Model.

    If I understand correctly we should have a CAP project with app (only the approuter), srv & db modules and a separate project for the Fiori app using the approach described in your blog?


    • Hi Pierre,

      awesome, I’d be happy to learn how much you like this new approach once you implemented it.

      What I meant to say is there can be many good reasons to continue using an approuter. Not more and not less than that 🙂

      Personally, I like to manage all modules of one project in one mono repo. E.g. you could have a project that includes CAP artifacts (approuter, srv, db) and one or more SAP Fiori Apps. As you already have an approuter in this scenario anyway, you could just use it for routing to your web apps as well.

      I guess it should also be possible to leave the approuter out entirely. Then you only had a srv and db module and you would need to add the “srv destination” somehow to your subaccount. But I haven’t tried this yet so I don’t want to promise too much now.

      I hope this answered your question.

  • Again great article Marius, thank you for your contributions to the community!

    One thing I want to point out: you position this concept as “serverless” and I think it might be mixed up with Serverless Architecture like FaaS / BaaS which is sort of “backend upon request”. In your case I guess what you mean is serving HTML5 from the approuter without another “serving” app required, but if you go for a “full” setup with DB, APIs etc. you would still need a proper backend / server. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

    • Hi Maxim,

      I deliberately choose this bold title to create an association with FaaS. When talking about “serverless”, most people think of FaaS but to me, serverless is the more general concept of not having to worry about compute resources and perfect scalability. And this concept is also used here.

      You are right, in most of today’s use-cases with CAP, there will most-likey be a backend component such as the srv or db module. But that doesn’t need to be true by-default. You could also create destinations that point to the SAP Cloud Platform Serverless Runtime and then your entire stack would be serverless.

  • It works like a charm ! Thank you Marius.

    I finally found my mistake thanks to you.

    The issue was that the part was missing in my manifest.json.

    Best regards,


  • Thanks a lot for the very detailed introduction into this concept, Marius! I can definitely see its benefits.

    Curently, this seems to require several (semi-)manual steps though such as uploading it to the HTML5 Application Repository. I am wondering how this would work together with a CI/CD pipeline or more specifically: how/when will Project Piper support this scenario?

    • Hi Nico,

      Can you please refer to the semi-manual steps you see and why they cannot be automized with Project Piper/any CI/CD pipeline?

      I think all pipelines that have access to the mbt tool and the cf CLI should be able to automate this flow (but I’m also not an expert).

      • Hi Marius,

        we misunderstood the term GACD interface as a new part in the UI/SCP cockpit. For this reason, we assumed that the app needs to be uploaded into the App Repo manually. Instead, it refers to the Generic Application Content Deployer, so I agree that this should work with Project Piper.