Application Development Blog Posts
Learn and share on deeper, cross technology development topics such as integration and connectivity, automation, cloud extensibility, developing at scale, and security.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
joachimrees1
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
You have joined me in finding those objects - if not you can read up here:

https://blogs.sap.com/2020/08/31/task-find-ddic-objects-that-miss-an-enhancement-category-part-1/
https://blogs.sap.com/2020/08/31/ddic-objects-that-miss-an-enhancement-category-part-2-use-cds-views...

Now let's fix it!

There are 2 aspects to that:
What categories should I set
and
How should I do it.

On what to set it to:

I want my tables to
1. Have an enhancement category
2. Not break stuff because of that new enhancement category .

The lazy way would be to set it to "allow everything":
- " Can be enhanced (Deep)"

...but I would feel very bad using this as a default (I think most of the time, I would not expect those structures to be extended with a "deep component (string, reference, or table type)" (Taken from F1-help, which is pretty good/detailed! )

The other extrem would be to set it to "Cannot Be Enhanced" which most certainly would break stuff.

So I think I go for what I (and others) should have done before me (this is debatable (-> comments! 😉 ) but that's what guided me in my ABAP-career).

1. By default, set it to "Can be enhanced (character-like or numeric)"
2. If this is not possible or doesn't make sense, choose something else -> the option that makes sense.

This is very generic, but I can give at least on example: There are BAPI-Structures, that should only contain characters. If you create (or append) one of those -> set the enhancement category to "character only".

I'll leave the "how" to the next part.
(Hint: I will not do it all manual by SE11 for every singel object.
Maybe I do get a hint an my question: https://answers.sap.com/questions/13129838/mass-maintenance-for-se11-setchange-enhancement-ca.html

If not (and probably even if), I have already looked into some (semi-)automation via SHDB.

Stay tuned! 😉
1 Comment