Skip to Content
Product Information
Author's profile photo Graziela Dondoni

TaxFactory 11.0

Hello community,

BSI TaxFactory and TaxFactory SaaS released version 11.0 is available.

After our partner BSI has extended the maintenance for their offering/Product BSI TaxFactory 10.0 up to April 30,2021. SAP has also decided to provide support for BSI TaxFactory 10.0 up to April 30, 2021.

Regardless of the extended support period for BSI TaxFactory 10, SAP strongly recommends not to postpone your upgrade to BSI TaxFactory 11 and still plan to complete the upgrade during this year.

As announced on BSI website JAVA/Tomcat 32bits is not supported anymore by BSI after TaxFactory 11.0 cyclic C and TaxFactory 10.0 cyclic X.3. For any query about this, please contact BSI Support.

Upgrade 
your payroll system to the corresponding BSI TaxFactory 11.0 product way before the decommissioning of BSI TaxFactory 10.0 support.
There are NO options to extend the support for TaxFactory 10.0 after the decommissioning date.

If you have any questions about BSI TaxFactory 11.0, you can post it here. I´m going to keep this updated with tips, best practices, and, SAP notes.

Important SAP notes:

2760305 – BSI: Tax Factory 11.0 – Main Note

As a prerequisite, you must apply the following SAP Notes:

2760918– BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – DDIC Changes

2763228 – BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – Function Modules Changes

2770832 – BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – General Technical Changes

2780204 – BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – Changes required for TaxFactory SaaS

2868617 – BSI: Tax Profile Factory SaaS correction

2780716 – BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – BSI Tools

2790902 – BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – Payroll Driver Changes

2844516 – BSI: TaxFactory 10.0 – Additional Configuration Options While in Transition to BSI TaxFactory 11.0

2852878 – BSI: Technical Correction changes

2854888 – BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – Configuration Option

2860747 – BSI: Tax Factory 11.0 – system not able to run TaxFactory SaaS

2864644 – BSI: Tax data synchronization error during transition from TaxFactory 10.0 to TaxFactory 11.0

2855926 – BSI: internat error US_UPDATE_TXIT_FROM_TAXES in BSI Tax Calculation

2865938 – BSI: Tax Factory 11.0 – system continues using TaxFactory 10.0 after upgrade – SaaS

2876817 – V_BTXRATE & V_BTXOVFR: not saving Experience Rate and incorrect number of digits for Tax Type

2853869 – TAX: Additional withholding not considered and Regular wages classified as Supplemental

2878074 –  BSI: Update to BTXRATE reader class usage

2904103 –  BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – Missing Changes in Structures for Release 600

2915653 – BSI: Unemployment Override not Being Considered on TaxFactory

3008339 – TAX: Community Safety Payroll Taxes for Eugene

3013127 – BSI: Enablement of Tax Type 106 for Concurrent Employment

Important:

Before applying SAP note 2915653, you must apply note 2844646 – Ignore the local class definition, implementation, definition deffered, definition load , definition local friends changes this notes contains a fix to SNOTE transaction and without this you will get an error.

2919499 – TAX: Experience Rates Calculated Incorrectly in Tax Result Log

2920181 – TAX: TaxFactory Version Source in USVERS

2934419 – TAX: TaxLocator not proposing Tax Areas in TaxFactory 11

2944465 – TAX: Full refund of Unemployment tax when using BTXRATE override

Further irformation about the installation can be found on:

2844034 – TaxFactory 11.0 – On-Premise Installation

2843977 – BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – SaaS Installation

2948446 – BSI: installation instructions for TaxLocator 11.0.

2977383 – BSI: Changes in Sync Tool Tax due to incorrect State

2988140 – IT0208: Performance issue when using Tax Locator

Frequently Asked Questions – FAQ

 

1) Which are the options for transition from TaxFactory 10.0 to TaxFactory 11.0?

  • In transaction SU3, define the user parameter BSI_TF_VERSION with value 11.
  • In transaction PE03, configure the BSI Tax Factory Version (10BSI) feature with value 11.
  • In transaction SM30, open table view Customer values for configuration options (V_T5F99K2) and set the value of constant BSI TAX FACTORY: CUSTOMIZING SWITCH (BSITF) to 11.Once your company switches to TaxFactory 11.0, you may no longer use TaxFactory 10.0, nor may you switch back to it later.

2) Which is the start date to be used in table V_T5F99K2 and constant BSITF?

The start date should be 01.01.1800, once you decide to upgrade the system to TaxFactory 11.0, as the system should use the version 11.0 for all the tax calculation, even in retroactive scenarios, where TaxFactory 10.0 were used.

 

3) When there is a negative value the system is not calculating taxes after the upgrade to TaxFactory 11.0, what is the cause?

Check if the Reverse Tax Engine is turned ON in your system, table V_T5F99K2, constant ADTMD, further information can be found on the KBA 2984562 – Reverse Tax Engine TaxFactory 11.0

4) Filing status/Marital status is missing or not updated in T5UTK. What should I do?

As T5UTK has delivery class C, you can update this table manually. To find the filling status that should be update in T5UTK you can go to MYBSI Portal (https://mybsiconnect.force.com/CustomLogin) with your credentials:

· Select Product Maintenance > TaxFactory ->  11.0
· Under Maintenance select Cyclic Bulletins -> BSI TaxFactory 11.0 Cyclic Bulletin
-> Bulletin Data nformation

 

5) There is a syntax error in LPBSUD01 after implementing SAP note 2915653, what is the cause and what are the steps fix it?

This is because SAP note 2844646 is not implemented in your system, or was applied after note 2915653.

To solve this SAP note 2844646 must be applied.

Detailed steps:

1) Perform the de-implementation of SAP note 2915653
2) Apply note 2844646
3) Retrieve the version of objects LPBSUD01 -> To do it go to transaction SE38 select LPBSUD01 -> Utilitiles -> version -> version management -> select version prior the note implementation
4) Re-apply note 2915653

 

6) Is it possible to extend the validity date of TaxFactory 10.0?

There is no extension to TaxFactory 10.0. Support for BSI TaxFactory 10.0 will be decommissioned on April 30, 2021.

7) How Local Reciprocity is working in BSI Tax Factory 11.0?
Detailed information is available on the KBA 2973907 BSI TaxFactory Local Reciprocity Process (Basic Local Reciprocity and Advanced Local Reciprocity)

 

8) I don´t see the WF parameter in BSI script, why?

The parameter WF: 0,0 is not being sent in all scenarios in the BSI script, as BSI considers it as WF: 0,0 if there isn´t this parameter in the BSI script. Parameter WF: 1,0 is always being sent in case the employee has IT0210 in 2020 onwards.


9) Parameter WF is not in the correct line in BSI interface in TaxFactory 11.0?

There is a change in TaxFactory 11.0 cyclic B the parameter WF should be placed in other line in BSI script. This change has been delivered in the W-4 notes for States, after you apply the notes this parameter will be send in the line BSI expects to do the calculation for FED taxes.

The change in the parameter has been delivered in SAP notes:
2895426 – Prerequisite objects for SAP Note 2878657
2878657 – 2020 State Withholding Tax Calculation – Based on the State (or State-equivalent) Withholding Certificate (SAP_HR) – Phase I

10) After the Support Package the system is calculating higher taxes when employee has IT0161, why?

After SAP notes 2888094 TAX: Lock-in letters override for W-4 exempt and 2880846 TAX: Lock-in letters not overriding New W-4 is now considering the values of IT0161 and now the system is calculating more tax, which is expected.

Refer to KBA for further details 2984188– Tax calculation for an employee with both IT0161 and IT0210.

Regards,

Graziela

Assigned tags

      416 Comments
      You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.
      Author's profile photo Sheetika Bhat
      Sheetika Bhat

      Hello. Can anyone please tell me the steps which i should follow for upgrade to bsi 11 from 10.
      As i read many blogs and its confusing

      If someone can please suggest steps to go from start to end that will be very helpfull.
      we have to upgrade asap as its already late.

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Sheetika,

      The main details of the upgrade can be checked on note 2760305 - BSI: Tax Factory 11.0 - Main Note.

      For the upgrade itself, you can refer to one of the below notes, depending if your enterprise has an On-Premise or SaaS installation:
      2843977 - BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 - SaaS Installation
      2844034 - TaxFactory 11.0 - On-Premise Installation

      Kind Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Greg Zifchock
      Greg Zifchock

      Oregon has approved new withholding taxes for Metro District CIty and Multnomah County. Will SAP be releasing Notes to support these? The taxes are subject to Live or Work requirements.

      Employees could be subject to multiple authorities for taxation how would these be configured?

      Example:

      We have employees that are subject to the Tri-Met District tax (OR01) but now they could also be subject to Multnomah (OR07) and Metro District City (?? SAP creating authority?)

      Thanks for any advise.

      Greg

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Greg,

      Please refer to the following KBA for details on this change: 3060362 - Multnomah County and Metro District City Oregon Taxes.

      Best Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Chandramouly Veeramony
      Chandramouly Veeramony

      Hello Carlos Accorsi  the KBA 3060362 appears not available for public use; not sure if it has been withdrawn. Could you let us know?

      Thanks

      Chandra

      Author's profile photo Graziela Dondoni
      Graziela Dondoni
      Blog Post Author

      Hi Chandra,

      We are checking what is happening with the KBA.
      Meantime I´m copying the information from it here:

      BSI Has released TUB 53 for TaxFactory 11d that will allow it to calculate taxes for Multnomah County and Metro District City
      The opt-in / opt-out for these new OR localities will be done through IT-210.
      If no extra information was provided in IT210, BSI will follow their regular calculation as described in the Quickformulas on BSI’s page

      Resolution

      • Run the synch tool after installing the TUB 
      • Add these tax authorities to your Tax Model as needed
      • Create an IT0210 for the locality (ie: OR31)
      • To opt-in use the Additional Withholding field in IT0210 
      • To opt-out use the exemption field in IT0210

      Kind regards,
      Graziela

      Author's profile photo Chandramouly Veeramony
      Chandramouly Veeramony

      Great!! thank you..

      Thanks

      Chandra

      Author's profile photo Graziela Dondoni
      Graziela Dondoni
      Blog Post Author

      Hi Chandra,

      A new KBA has been created to handle it.
      3071303 

      Kind regards,
      Graziela

      Author's profile photo Greg Zifchock
      Greg Zifchock

      Graziela,

      I think SAP is missing something. I believe I've configured the new tax correctly but it is still not working:

      Regards,

      Greg

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Greg,

      Would you please open an incident reporting this scenario? Please use component PY-US-TX.

      I believe that this is being caused by a misconfiguration, but we'll have to check the case on your system to localize it.

      Thank you,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Thumma Chakradhar
      Thumma Chakradhar

      Hello Team,

      We are newly implementing ECP and BSI TaxFactory, as per the standard document provided by SAP document "SF_ECPAY_BSI" we have configured and We have tested the connection to BSI Saas in ECP, the connection test is successful. But while running the payroll I am seeing the attached error.

      Also while checking HRPAYUS_TAX_SYNC_DT transaction we are not seeing the TUB levels.

      I also checked in SOAMANAGER --> Web Service Configuration --> details of consumer Proxy:CO_HRCUSCL_T11_BSITF11SERVICE  --> DEFAULT_LPORT is active but when I ping web service throwing an error message with (RC=404) error

      Please advise on this error. Appreciate it if you could respond with the resolution.

      Regards,

      Chakradhar Thumma

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Chakradhar,

      Please check the following:

      1. 2843977 – BSI: TaxFactory 11.0 – SaaS Installation
      This note was the one which has delivered TaxFactory 11.0 for Saas customers.
      Please review it carefully and make sure that you have followed all its instructions on your system.
      I believe that the missing Sync Tool information is being caused due to a missing point of note 2843977.

      2. BSI Credentials
      The error on the payroll log states that the authentication of the password and username has failed.
      Therefore, you need to ensure that you are imputing the correct information (user, password, dataset name...) when configuring your system.
      You should be able to check this data by accessing your BSI Portal. In case you would like to confirm if this is the correct data, this would need to be checked with BSI team directly.

      Best Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo time and payroll team
      time and payroll team

      Hi Team

      We have upgraded from TF 10.0 to TF 110.0.d, TUB #49 and with the live payroll, we are seeing that the Unemployment taxes (/410) are overstated. SAP Incident have been submitted # 410321 for troubleshooting

      want to check if anyone have experienced the same ?

       

      Thanks

      Lakshmy

       

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hi Lakshmy,

      I took over your case.

      Kind Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Santino Neri
      Santino Neri

      Hello,

      We just updated our TF11 to Cyclic D1 and we noticed it is not being reflected correctly in the initial screen of HRPAUUS_SYNC_TAX_DT.  Under "Regulatory Bulletin Information" it shows:

      Level in BSI Client: TaxFactory 11.0.d | Cyclic D1 | Regulatory 053 | TaxLocator N/A
      Cross-client Tables: TaxFactory 11.0.d1 | Cyclic D1 | Regulatory 053 | TaxLocator N/A
      Client-specific Tables: TaxFactory 11.0.d1 | Cyclic D1 | Regulatory 053 | TaxLocator N/A

      As you can see the "Level in BSI Client" is not consistent. Is anyone else seen this in their Production systems?  We had no issues in our DEV and QA environments.  Is there a way to resolve this or somewhere we can look for further info?

      Thanks,
      Santino

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Santino,

      I believe that you should be facing this issue due to the program that was not updated on BSI side.
      Refer to KBA 2443834 - TaxFactory cyclic upgrade doesn´t show the new version.

      The following blog may also help on this check: BSI TaxFactory 10 Cyclic Update (it's for TaxFactory 10.0 but still valid for TaxFactory 11.0).

      Kind Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Santino Neri
      Santino Neri

      Hi Carlos,

      It was my error.  I thought I had updated the server files with the D.1 version and instead I still had the D cyclic version in place.  Once I updated those files, the versions showed all in synch with D.1.

      Thanks,
      Santino

      Author's profile photo Thumma Chakradhar
      Thumma Chakradhar

      Hello Team,

      We are newly implementing ECP and BSI Tax Setup 11, unable to see the Cross Client and Client Specific data in Sync tool, and If I execute the Sync tool in a test run, getting the Data Set connectivity error.

       

      Could someone help with this resolution?

      Regards,

      Chakri

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Chakri,

      Please refer to KBA 2325349 - BSI TaxFactory Saas Application Error.

      Best Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Fojan Moini
      Fojan Moini

      Hi Team,

      We are seeing missing WF parameters in the BSI Interface after implementing the BSI Tax factory 11. Is this expected? We are having an issue in off-cycle year-end adjustment payroll for the Non-Cash Gross-up supplemental wage types not populating the /4** tax wage types during the payroll run. When this is raised to the BSI vendor they referred to the missing WF 'CRSVD1' parameter related to the Cyclic-b API enhancement. Could you please assist here?

      BSI

      Regards,

      Shiva.

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Shiva,

      Is the employee being maintained with a W-4 record that follows the old format?
      If so, it would be expected the parameter WF to do not be sent on the BSI Interface.

      You may refer to 2985123 - The Parameter WF on the BSI Interface: TaxFactory 10.0 and TaxFactory 11.0.

      As per the zero calculation for /4xx, were you able to validate this calculation via batch test?
      If so, BSI team should be able to appoint on the script what's triggering the zero calculation.

      Best Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Fojan Moini
      Fojan Moini

      Hi Carlos,

      Yes, the W2 record is from the old format and we see that it is sending a blank identifier for the WF (0,0) as per the BSI TF11 cyclic b.

      We are processing the gross-up supplement OC year-end adjustment. In the payroll run, BSI has calculated the gross-up tax amount and the custom wage types (GrossUp gross and tax) are populated accordingly. However, it didn't generate the /4XX wage types for the individual tax authorities.

      We could see the tax amounts for the individual authorities in the Batch test.

      Regards,
      Shiva.

      Author's profile photo Euna Lee
      Euna Lee

      Hello,

       

      Hope everyone is well. It's not about 11.0 upgrade, but I was wondering if there's a way to validate the table contents.

      I've started supporting two different companies and noticed that some tables are not identical, like missing tax authorities and mismatching.

       

      Thank you,

      Euna

       

      Author's profile photo Cassiana Giani
      Cassiana Giani

      Great blog, very helpful!

      Author's profile photo Graziela Dondoni
      Graziela Dondoni
      Blog Post Author

      Thank you for the feedback, Cassi!

      Author's profile photo Rosette Vaughn
      Rosette Vaughn

      This question is regarding Service Packs -

      We’ve loaded service packs SAPKE60884 – SAPKE60893 in our test system and we’re experiencing issues when we retro payroll back to beginning of the year.

      • In retro, PA LST tax is refunding.
      • In retro, NY SDI tax is refunding.

      We experienced issues with WTA; splits were removed in table TAX with retro which displayed error message “Entry in TAX for Authority XX is missing.”  We loaded Note 3060814 – WTA: Payroll hard stop when ALP Override is removed in retro which fixed the issue.

      We also experienced issues with additional withholding amounts being taken at the local level but Note 3056767 – TAX: Additional withholding fields from state W-4 incorrectly used for localities fixed the issue.

      Can you advise us on what’s causing refunding of PA LST tax and NY SDI tax in retro?  And what is required to fix these issues.

      Thank you,

      Rosette Vaughn

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Rosette,

      The refund issue should have been caused as a side effect of SAP Note 3033143 (TAX - Flat Taxes are taxed twice in off-cycle execution).

      However, SAP Note 3054376 (TAX: Flat taxes refunded in retrocalculations) has been released to correct this refund issue.

      Would you please apply it on your system and retest the scenario? I believe that it'll solve the incorrect behavior you're seeing.

      Best Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Jaikishan Biradar
      Jaikishan Biradar

      Hi Carlos,

      I had similar issue, SAP note 3054376 fixed LST tax refund issue.

      However I could see a different behavior for withholding tax PA locals. any thoughts?

       

      Thanks and Regards

      Jaikishan.

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Jaikishan,

      Would you please provide more details on which is the different behavior you're seeing for PA locals?

      Sincerely thanks,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Jaikishan Biradar
      Jaikishan Biradar

      Hi Carlos,

      Withholding 001 tax is refunded for PCB2 - Whitemarsh Township in retro calculations.

      There is no change in tax data or anything but still along with TT 084, TT 01 is also refunded.

       

       

      Thanks and Regards

      Jaikishan

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hi Jaikishan,

      Would you please check if there is any BSI Message on the payroll log?
      I believe that it may be something related to Reciprocity behavior.

      You may refer to 2973907 - FAQ - Reciprocity for Payroll USA.

      Kind Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Jaikishan Biradar
      Jaikishan Biradar

      Hi Carlos,

       

      No Message in BSI, Not sure if this is related to reciprocity as there is no change in residence/work tax area.

       

      Thanks and Regards

      Jaikishan

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hi Jaikishan,

      I see that you've opened a SAP Case.
      A colleague took it over.

      Thank you,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Jaikishan Biradar
      Jaikishan Biradar

      Yes, I am yet to hear back from SAP on the case.

      However, after applying SAP note - 3054376 - TAX: Flat taxes refunded in retrocalculations, system retros back to 12/31/2020 to all employees, this is expected after applying the note?

      But we don't want it for all employees, we will do force retro to impacted employees.

      Thanks and Regards

      Jaikishan

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hi Jaikishan,

      My colleague will proceed with the analyzes of this scenario on the ticket you've opened.

      Kind Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Stanette Balser
      Stanette Balser

      Hello,

      I am working to implement TUBS 54-60 and am unable to locate any notes for new tax type 108 and 109.

      Any idea when those notes will be available?  It appears TUB 60 has an important change for Massachusetts with a retro needed and looks to be a state deadline of 8/31/2021.

      Please advise.

      Thank you,

      Stanette Balser

       

      Author's profile photo Graziela Dondoni
      Graziela Dondoni
      Blog Post Author

      Hi Stanette,

      I just talked to Developer and they are working on this now.

      Once I have any new information I will share here.

      Kind regards,
      Graziela

      Author's profile photo Jaikishan Biradar
      Jaikishan Biradar

      Hi Graziela,

       

      Please let us know by when new tax types will be available?  New tax type will be part of next tubs or it will be through SAP note?

       

      Thanks and Regards

      Jaikishan

      Author's profile photo Graziela Dondoni
      Graziela Dondoni
      Blog Post Author

      Hello Jaikishan,

      This is planned to be released tomorrow.

      The note number is Note 3090748 - TAX: New Tax Types 108 and 109 (you will not be able to access it yet as it still in process, once released you can access it).

      Kind regards,
      Graziela

      Author's profile photo Jaikishan Biradar
      Jaikishan Biradar

      Thank you for the information Graziela!

      Author's profile photo Euna Lee
      Euna Lee

      Hi Graziela,

       

      If we apply TUBs before applying the note, should we need to re-apply TUBs?

       

      Regards,

      Euna

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hello Euna,

      You can proceed rerunning the Sync Tool in productive mode on your system, as detailed on the manual steps of note 3090748.
      This is intended to sync the data between SAP/BSI as per the new TUB delivery and you should see the new Tax Types on your system.

      Best Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Rosette Vaughn
      Rosette Vaughn

      Hi Carlos,

      We're still having refunding issues of PA Local LST and NY SDI in retro after we loaded SAPKE60894 - SAPKE60897.  In  Service Pack 97, I see note 3068857-TAX: New BAdI to select tax authority for Local Service Tax (LST).  Would this have something to do with refunding?

      We previously experienced this issue of PA Local LST and NY SDI tax refunding in retro but your reply to load notes 3054376 and 3060814 fixed the issue.

      Can you advise what is needed to fix the issue now?

      Thank you,

      Rosette

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hi Rosette,

      Would you please let me know the values of the parameters BW, PW and PT that you are seeing on the BSI Interface of the incorrect case?
      I believe that the refund may be related with these parameters.

      Thank you,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Rosette Vaughn
      Rosette Vaughn

      Hi Carlos,

      here's the info you requested.  Let me know if you need additional information.

      PA LST -

      ADC TC: PA6S NR: 0 RP: 1 RC: 0 SE: 0 NX: 0

      HUD TT: 084 FN: 1 PW: 3115.20 HW: 94.80 MS: 1 NE: 0

      ADD TE: 0 YW: 28890.57 YT: 2.00 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 RF: 1 YG: 28890.57

      VDC AT: 0

      SDC SM: 9 BW: 2560.00

      EDC DE: 0 NA: 0

      LUD ES: 0 PW: 1559.20 PT: 2.00 SA: 0 QW: 11891.14 PND: 0 MND: 0 QND: 0

      YND: 0

       

      NY SDI –

      ADC TC: NY NR: 0 RP: 0 RC: 0 SE: 0 NX: 0

      HUD TT: 041 FN: 1 PW: 3958.33 HW: 88.00 MS: 1 NE: 0

      ADD TE: 0 YW: 260.00 YT: 1.30 RN: 0 PW: 1.00 RF: 0 YG: 39583.30

      VDC AT: 0

      SDC SM: 9 BW: 3958.33

      EDC DE: 0 NA: 0

      LUD ES: 0 PW: 780.00 PT: 3.90 SA: 0 ER: 0.005000 PND: 0 MND: 0 QND: 0 YND: 0

       

      Tks,

      Rosette

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hi Rosette,

      Thank you for the details.

      We have been checking this scenario internally and it seems that a bug has been identified.

      The developers are already working on a correction note and I'll update you here once this note has been released.

      Sincerely thanks,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Barbara Dillon
      Barbara Dillon

      Hi Carlos,

       

      Is there an ETA on when a note will be delivered to fix the bug for PA Local LST and NY SDI tax refunding incorrectly in retro processing?   Thanks so much!

       

      Barbara Dillon

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hi Barbara/Rosette

      The note has just been released for general availability: 3098271 - TAX: Considering incorrect payroll results for Local Service Tax calculation.

      Sincerely thanks,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Barbara Dillon
      Barbara Dillon

      Thank you Carlos!   Is this note just to fix the PA Local Service Tax and not the NY SDI tax?

      Author's profile photo Carlos Accorsi
      Carlos Accorsi

      Hi Barbara,

      The text of note 3098271 mentions LST, but some of the code which has been changed by this note is not specific to LST.
      Therefore, given the same scenario, this note may also fix the SDI tax.

      In case the issue persists with the SDI tax, please open a case on component PY-US-TX as we'll have to take a further look on it.

      Best Regards,
      Carlos

      Author's profile photo Gina Auer
      Gina Auer

      Hello,

       

      I have looked all over and cannot locate any documentation on my question, possibly you can help?  We are beginning plans to upgrade our ECC EHP8 system running on Oracle, to ECC EHP8 running on HANA - We are currently running BSI 11.b, and will update prior to DB update - so my question is:

      Do we need to reinstall BSI 11 from scratch or can we simply reconnect the systems in the BSI website and in the instances?

      I need to answer this for the project plan, so any information would be very helpful!

      Thank you.