Skip to Content

Data migration is one of the key processes in an SAP implementation. Identifying the right dataset or even identifying unusable dataset, transforming the data into desired format, extracting them from the source system and then finally loading into the SAP system is a long, cumbersome, and error-prone process which requires not only the knowledge of SAP, relevant process and data structure but it also requires extensive knowledge and experience as data architect. Additionally, in today’s world where data is available electronically in the form of many source system be it an Excel-based legacy system or an old ERP implementation or even a modern-day implementation of business functions, it is critical to understand the approach of data migration and even more critical is the buy-in from sponsor and the key stakeholders of the project.

In this blog, we will look into the different steps of data migration. The purpose of this blog is not to drill upon individual steps rather it will identify the necessary steps, any pre-requisites or dependencies with the other steps, ownership and the phase in which the given activity will be carried out. The blog can be used as a playbook for the data migration from one source system to S4HANA. Below diagram identify the source and target system.

 

 

The migration steps can be broadly categorized into

  • Migration Approach
  • Planning
  • Execution
  • Testing & Validation
  • Closure

Migration Approach

The first step in any data migration initiative, irrespective of the driving force of the migration, is deciding the approach. The approach can be either a big-bang or incremental. There are advantages & disadvantages of each approach. Any discussion related to the approach is beyond the scope of this blog however, it is imperative to note the following differences between the two approaches.

Big Bang Data Migration Incremental

·         Complete migration in one go

·         Requires downtime window

·         High Risk

·         Migration can complete within a short amount of time

·         Cost effective*

·         Strong verification & validation strategy

·         No Parallel run needed

·         Phased approach based on the need/priority

·         It doesn’t require any downtime

·         Low Risk

·         Long timeline to complete the migration

·         Costly* as compared to big-bang

 

·         Strong verification & validation strategy

·         Two system will run in parallel

*The comparison is made only for the direct cost of migration.

Planning

Now, when we know about the source system we can start planning the approach to the data migration. The data migration approach and planning are the key to success. Depending upon the number of factors the approach for the migration will different. However, from the planning purpose, the timeline and milestones for the migration would be critical. The simplest scenario is a greenfield implementation. Another scenario is when the client is retiring another ERP system say a financial system and moving into SAP S4HANA. In yet another scenario, when company A, which prefers SAP S4HANA, acquires company B and retires the company B’s old but functional systems. In all of these scenarios, data migration is a must.

As in the diagram below, the data migration planning requires many inputs; they are

  • Project Management Plan
  • Enterprise Constraints
  • Risk Management Plan
  • Project Charter
  • Project Scope Statement

The outputs of this planning process are:

  • Data Migration Plan
  • Updated Project Management Plan
  • Updated Risk Management Plan
  • Updated Risk Register

 

Execution

During this part of the process, the experts will identify the data from the source system that needs to be migrated. It is important that the experts from the target system must review those datasets to ensure that their needs are met. Often times, I have seen that the review process is not robust costing the client heartache and headache at the 11th hour. Additionally, this review process will help the team migrate only the required data and in the right format. For one of the major Canadian bank, the review team ignored the column header that was part of the migrated data. At another bank, the date was provided in the YYYYMMDD format instead of MMDDYYYY.

It is mandatory to do the gap analysis at this phase of the migration. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the gaps between what can be delivered and what is desired. Those gaps either can be filled or should be accepted as a gap.

Testing & Validation

The date format or the row header issues, as mentioned above, were identified at this phase. At yet another bank, we faced a major challenge in terms of date formatting. Data from some of the fields were extracted in MM/DD/YYYY format while others were in DD/MM/YYYY format. What made the situation complex was the fact that the test data was provided only for the 1st 10 days of the month and the test load was successful. The lesson learned was that the test data must be random and should have sufficient breadth.

I also believe that the data migration process should be executed as a Financial System where at every step the auditors can audit. What I mean here is several levels of reconciliation should happen as a part of the plan. The first level of recon should be a simple sum of a numeric field, a number of rows, minimum/maximum of a date field etc. It should be compared every time the dataset is extracted to a file, transfer the file from one server to another, loaded the data in the staging area and when the data is pulled from the staging area into the target system. The second set of recon should more complex such as executing a complete workflow or a report and comparing the output from the source system as well as the target system. The final level of recon should be more at the system level by executing a complete function such as MRP and comparing the results.

Closure

Most of the experts feel that this part of the process is not required. However, in this part of the process, you ask for signoff from the clients, in writing. I believe this is the most critical aspect of data migration.

Below is the list of key steps along with the owner of those steps are identified.

Steps Primary Owner Secondary Owner Phase
High Level data Migration Plan Vendor Client Prepare
Detail Data Migration Plan Vendor Client Explore
Approve Data Migration Plan Client NA Explore
Data Migration Templates for Master & Transaction Data Vendor Client Realize
Identify Data Conversion Fields Vendor Client Realize
Field Mapping Vendor Client Realize/Deploy
Gap Analysis (Gap Report) Vendor Client Realize/Deploy
Dependency Analysis (Dependency Report) Vendor Client Realize/Deploy
Plan to populate Missing Information Client Vendor Realize/Deploy
Provide  data in the specified format Client Vendor Deploy
Mock Data Load Vendor Client Deploy
Identify Errors in data load Vendor Client Deploy
Fix the errors Client Vendor Deploy
Exception Report Vendor Client Deploy
Repeat Data Load & error fixing Respective Respective Respective
Provide Final Data Client Vendor Run
Load Final Data Vendor Client Run
Provide Delta Data (in case of the parallel run) Client Vendor Run
Load Delta Data (in case of the parallel run) Vendor Client Run
Provide data load confirmation Client Vendor Run

 

Irrespective of the approach – Big bang or Iterative – the steps within are repetitive as shown below.

 

In nutshell, data migration is a clumsy process but has useful results if done with the right approach and with proper planning.

To report this post you need to login first.

2 Comments

You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.

Leave a Reply