Skip to Content

[#meta: I’m missing a place here, where I can quickly drop an idea or a thought. I initially thought of making this a CoffeCorner discussion, but then went for the blog-option. Do let me know your thoughts on that as well!]

Thinking out loud: It would be nice to have a “SFW5 – switch-switcher“,  quickly outline now:

Situation:
Assume I have a few addons, that are part of packages, which are assigned to switches (SFW1), which are assigned to Business Functions (SFW5).

Let’s call them

  • Y_addon_1
  • Y_addon_2
  • Y_addon_3
  • Y_addon_n

 

We can assume the naming package = switch  = business function for simplicity. Oh, and the Business Functions are set to be reversible!

Now I would like to have a report (or something) that does the following:

  1. Take the first addone, got to sfw5
  2. (assuming it is turned on:) turn it off, activate (the de-activation :-)).
  3. Wait for (de)activation to finish.
  4. do [some Tests]
  5. go back to sfw5 and turn it on again.
  6. [maybe run another test]
  7. repeat with the next Business Function.

The [some Tests] part could be running eCatts, or just calling some business transactions (e.g. VA01, LT12..) -> see if they compile all right, or if they dump with a Syntax error.

 

The reason I want to do this, is testing/finding errors.

When writing the addon, I might have accidentally assigned some objects to another package -> so when switching off, some objects might stay on, causing syntax (or semantical?) errors – I’d like to find those.

 

Outlook:
Further uses might be to not only turn off-and on one by one, but also test if combinations still work fine. (There are 2^n possible combinations, where n is the number of Business-Functions).

We probably also should remember the initial switch-state (what is on, what is off), and anways be able to return to that.

 

So, some Questions:

  • Does such a thing already exist maybe?
  • …or parts of it? Is there an interface (e.g. a class), to SFW5, which I can use in ABAP (or elsewhere e.g. SCP).
  • – would you see use for such a tool in your work?
  • – would a good package structure (se21) including enforcement via Package Checks make it superfluous? (I’m sure it would help to not accidently assigning something to a wrong package; but the tool might still be helpful for finding bugs in different switch constellations).

 

let me know your thoughts!

Joachim

To report this post you need to login first.

Be the first to leave a comment

You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.

Leave a Reply