Skip to Content
Author's profile photo Lars Breddemann

Modelling Learning Double Action or two things I just learned about modelling in SAP HANA SPS 11

Far fetched…

A colleague asked me over a year ago (2015 and SPS 9 … sounds ancient now, I know) whether it is possible to leverage information models in a different SAP HANA instance via SDA (Smart Data Access – look it up in the documentation if you didn’t know this yet).

The scenario in mind here was a SAP BW on HANA system reading data from a Suite on HANA system and using the SAP HANA live content (, installed there.

The Open ODS feature of SAP BW on HANA was to be used here as it allows reading from tables and views exposed via SDA in the local SAP HANA instance.

Now this idea sounds splendid.

Instead of having to manually build an extractor or an data export database view (both of which can be extensive development efforts), why not simply reuse the ready made content of SAP HANA live for this?

As usual the proof of the pudding is in the eating and as soon as it was tried out a severe shortcoming was identified:

    ('PLACEHOLDER' = ('$$userNameFilter$$', 'USER_NAME= LARS'))
Could not execute 'select * from "LARS"."IMACCESS_LBPB/SCV_USERS"('PLACEHOLDER' = ('$$userNameFilter$$', 'USER_NAME= ...'
SAP DBTech JDBC: [7]: feature not supported:
Cannot use parameters on row table: IMACCESS_LBPB/SCV_USERS: line 1 col 22 (at pos 21)


I just created an Information Model similar to the ones provided with the SAP HANA Live content including the heavily used Input Parameters to enable the model to be flexible and reusable (and also to allow filter push-down) but SAP HANA tells me:

“Nope, I’m not doing this, because the PLACEHOLDER syntax only works for information views and not for ‘row tables’.”

This ‘row table’ part of the error message stems from the fact that SAP HANA SPS 9 showed SDA tables as row store tables. This also means that all data read from the SDA source gets temporarily stored in SAP HANA row store tables before further processed in the query.

One reason for doing that probably was that the mapping from ODBC row format to column store format (especially the data type mapping from other vendors DBMS) was easier to manage with the SAP HANA row store.

Having said that, when accessing another SAP HANA system, such format mapping surely should be no problem, right?


And in fact there is an option to change this: the parameter “virtual_table_format” in the “smart_data_access” section on of the indexserver.ini:

= Configuration

Name                     | Default

  indexserver.ini          |       

    smart_data_access      |       

     virtual_table_format  | auto 

This parameter can be set to ROW, COLUMN or AUTO (the SPS 11 default value, automatically using the right format depending on the SDA adapter capabilities).

For more on how “capabilities” influence the SDA adapter behavior, check the documentation.

Back last year I wasn’t aware of this parameter and so I couldn’t try and see if, after changing the parameter, the query would’ve worked.

Anyhow, like all good problems the question just popped up again and I had an opportunity to look into this topic once more.

“Smarter” at last…

And lo and behold, with SAP HANA SPS 11 the PLACEHOLDER syntax works like a charm even for virtual tables.

SELECT -- local execution ---
     sum("KF1") AS "KF1",
     sum("KF2") AS "KF2",
FROM "_SYS_BIC"."devTest/stupidFactView"
    ('PLACEHOLDER' = ('$$IP_FACTOR$$','34'))
WHERE "D10_VAL" = 'DimValue9'
and "D100_VAL" = 'DimValue55'


D10_VAL     D100_VAL    KF1         KF2         CC_KF1_FACTORED

DimValue9   DimValue55  -1320141.70 525307979   -44884817     

successfully executed in 352 ms 417 µs  (server processing time: 7 ms 385 µs)

successfully executed in 356 ms 581 µs  (server processing time: 8 ms 437 µs)

successfully executed in 350 ms 832 µs  (server processing time: 8 ms 88 µs)

OPERATOR_NAME       OPERATOR_DETAILS                                         EXECUTION_ENGINE

COLUMN SEARCH       ‘DimValue9’,




                     TO_BIGINT(TO_DECIMAL(SUM(FACT.KF1), 21, 2) * ’34’)






                        SUM(FACT.KF2)                                        COLUMN

    JOIN            JOIN CONDITION:

                    (INNER) FACT.DIM100 = DIM1000.ID,

                    (INNER) FACT.DIM10 = DIM10.ID                            COLUMN

      COLUMN TABLE                                                           COLUMN

      COLUMN TABLE  FILTER CONDITION: DIM1000.VAL = n’DimValue55′            COLUMN

      COLUMN TABLE  FILTER CONDITION: DIM10.VAL = n’DimValue9′               COLUMN


See how the SPS 11 SQL optimisation is visible in the EXPLAIN PLAN: since the tables involved are rather small and only two dimensions are actually referenced, the OLAP engine (usually responsible for STAR SCHEMA queries) didn’t kick in, but the execution was completely done in the Join Engine.

Also notable: the calculated key figure was reformulated internally into a SQL expression AFTER the parameter value (34) was supplied.

This is a nice example for how SAP HANA does a lot of the query optimisation upon query execution.

If I had used a placeholder (question mark – ?) for the value instead, this whole statement would still work, but it would not have been optimised by the SQL optimizer and instead the calculation view would’ve been executed “as-is”.

Now the same statement accessing the “remote” view:


SELECT -- SDA access ---
     sum("KF1") AS "KF1",
     sum("KF2") AS "KF2",
FROM "DEVDUDE"."self_stupidFactView"
    ('PLACEHOLDER' = ('$$IP_FACTOR$$','34'))
WHERE "D10_VAL" = 'DimValue9'
and "D100_VAL" = 'DimValue55'


D10_VAL     D100_VAL    KF1         KF2         CC_KF1_FACTORED

DimValue9   DimValue55  -1320141.70 525307979   -44884817     

successfully executed in 351 ms 430 µs  (server processing time: 12 ms 417 µs)

successfully executed in 360 ms 272 µs  (server processing time: 11 ms 15 µs)

successfully executed in 359 ms 371 µs  (server processing time: 11 ms 914 µs)

OPERATOR_NAME           OPERATOR_DETAILS                                                       EXECUTION_ENGINE

COLUMN SEARCH           ‘DimValue9’, self_stupidFactView.D100_VAL,





  COLUMN SEARCH         SUM(self_stupidFactView.KF1),




                        (ENUM_BY: REMOTE_COLUMN_SCAN)                                          ROW

    REMOTE COLUMN SCAN  SELECT SUM(“self_stupidFactView”.”KF1″),




                        FROM “_SYS_BIC”.”devTest/stupidFactView”

                            ( PLACEHOLDER.”$$IP_FACTOR$$” => ’34’ )  “self_stupidFactView”

                        WHERE “self_stupidFactView”.”D10_VAL” = ‘DimValue9’

                        AND “self_stupidFactView”.”D100_VAL” = ‘DimValue55’

                        GROUP BY “self_stupidFactView”.”D100_VAL”                               EXTERNAL


Because of the mentioned parameter setting, SAP HANA now can create a statement that can be send to the “remote” database to produce the wanted output.

Note how the statement in the REMOTE COLUMN SCAN is not exactly the statement we used: the aggregated columns are now the first in the statement and the parameter syntax used is the new “arrow”-style syntax (PLACEHOLDER.”$$<name> $$” => ‘<value>’). This nicely reveals how SDA actually rewrites the statement in order to get the best outcome depending on the source systems capabilities.

For a better overview on what happens in both scenarios please look at this piece of ASCII art in awe πŸ™‚

|[ ]| = system boundaries

local statement execution

|[SQL statement ->    Information view -> Tables +]|


|[       RESULT < ——————————-+]|

SDA statement execution

|[SQL Statement -> Virtual Table -> SDA connection ->]| — ODBC transport –> |[ Information view -> Tables +]|


|[       RESULT < ———————————–]| <– ODBC transport — |[–<  RESULT <—————+]|

For more on SDA, BW on HANA and how both work together have a look here:

And while there, don’t miss out on the other “new in SPS 11”- stuff (if not already familiar with it anyhow)

The Web, Stars and the importance of trying things out

For the question discussed above I of course needed to have a test setup ready.

Creating the SDA remote source was the easiest part here, as I just created a “self” source system (BW veterans will remember this approach) that simply pointed to the very same SAP HANA instance.

In order to emulate a proper SAP HANA live view I needed to create an Information model with Input Parameters, so I thought: easy, let’s just quickly build one in the Web based development workbench.

So far I’ve done most of the modelling in SAP HANA studio, so I took this opportunity to get a bit more familiar with the new generation of tools.

I wanted to build a classic Star-Schema-Query model, so that I could use the Star Join function.

From SAP HANA Studio I knew that this required calculation views of of FACT and DIMENSION to work.

Not a problem at all to create those.


A CUBE type view for the fact table


One of the Dimension type views

I then went on and created a new calculation view of data type CUBE and checked the WITH STAR JOIN check box.


Next I tried to add all my FACT and DIMENSION views to the join, but boy was I wrong…


Clicking on the ➕ button should allow to add the views.


But no option there to add the fact view into the STAR JOIN node – while adding dimension just worked fine:


Now I had all my dimensions in place but no way to join them with fact table:


After some trial and error (and no, I didn’t read the documentation and I should have. But on the other hand, a little more guidance in the UI wouldn’t hurt either) I figured out that one has to manually add a projection or aggregation node that feeds into the Star Join:


Once this is done, the columns that should be visible in the Star join need to be mapped:

And NOW we can drag and drop the join lines between the different boxes in the Star Join editor.


Be careful not to overlook that the fact table that just got added, might not be within the current window portion. In that case either zoom out with the [-] button or move the view around via mouse dragging or the arrow icons.


After the joins are all defined (classic star schema, left outer join n:1, remember?) again the mapping of the output columns need to be done.


Here, map only the key figures, since the dimension columns are already available in the view output  anyhow as “shared columns“.


For my test I further went on and added a calculated key figure that takes an Input Parameter to multiply one of the original key figures. So,nothing crazy about that, which is why I spare you the screen shot battle for this bit πŸ˜‰ .

And that’s it again for today.

Two bits of new knowledge in one blog post, tons of screenshots and even ASCII art – not too bad for a Monday I’d say.

There you go, Now you know!


Assigned Tags

      You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.
      Author's profile photo Raj Kumar S
      Raj Kumar S

      Hi Lars,

      Superb..... you are simply a knowledge hub πŸ™‚

      Author's profile photo Lars Breddemann
      Lars Breddemann
      Blog Post Author

      Thanks Raj!

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Thanks. Fantastic Blog Lars and another good feature with HANA SPS11 (already Production ready with DCP released with Rev 112)

      We tried an SDA scenario with HANA SPS08 where the we used a BW OpenODS view to consume a ECC HANA Live Information model (on separate HANA DB) via SDA. A BEx query was created on OpenODS view in BW with a variable (filter) on a characteristic and we were getting the same error (syntax not supported).

      Will try the same scenario again and post our findings



      PS: I think I know the colleague you are talking about ( and the reason for the question πŸ™‚ coming to you - as I have been asking her for this info)

      Author's profile photo Lars Breddemann
      Lars Breddemann
      Blog Post Author

      Small world πŸ™‚ Especially here Down Under...

      Author's profile photo chandan praharaj
      chandan praharaj

      Hi Lars,

      Nice blog and indeed new thing for me, Still I have few doubts :

      1. What is ASCII art, how to get it.

      2. How you have got the Execution Plan, which you have shown in your Blog. Is it from PLAN Viz, I havnt seen this, am I missing somthing.

      Please guide or give me some pointer.



      Author's profile photo Lars Breddemann
      Lars Breddemann
      Blog Post Author


                  |           |

      +--------------------+  |

      |                       |

      | This is ASCII art <---+



      Maybe it's an age thing and the younger generation doesn't have that context... *cough*

      For the execution plan: that's just the (slightly reformatted) output from the EXPLAIN PLAN function in SAP HANA Studio.

      Author's profile photo chandan praharaj
      chandan praharaj


      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Lars thanks,

      there is missing very basic functionality for input parameters in modeling, please voite if you agree)


      POST data

      Author's profile photo Renjith E P
      Renjith E P

      Hello Lars,

      in SPS 11, Is there a limitation that, in the star join we cannot use a text join as the join type between the fact table and the dimension. I was trying to do a star join between a fact table Β and multiple standard SAP Text tables (in order to derive the texts like material description, plant description, vendor name etc). all the text tables had a column "SPRAS" and I could not get my model activated as the activation was throwing an error saying "Duplicate column Spras". I did tryo rename the columns, but then my text joins would not work as the renamed "spras" column does not appear in the "language" option of the text join.

      Thanks in advance for any expert advice.

      Author's profile photo Lars Breddemann
      Lars Breddemann
      Blog Post Author

      You want to model the text joins in the dimension views and not expose them directly in the star join.

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      HI Lars,

      I am trying the same scenario (VT on remote Calc view with Input parameter) using SDI but it is not working with placeholder. Do you know if there is any different way to do this in SDI connection?


      Author's profile photo Lars Breddemann
      Lars Breddemann
      Blog Post Author

      SDI is a very different technology than SDA and I haven't tried out accessing calc views remotely via SDI. What exactly would be the benefit over SDA here?

      Author's profile photo Gary Ganesan
      Gary Ganesan

      Hi Lars,

      I'm on SPS12 and I tried to pass the input parameter using SQL and it works perfect as expected (i.e. the value in placeholder gets passed to the remote view's input parameter)

      Have you tried using a graphical calc view, if this is possible?

      I tried to use a graphical calculation view but the input parameter in this case does not get passed to the remote calculation view.

      Author's profile photo Lars Breddemann
      Lars Breddemann
      Blog Post Author

      Not quite sure that I completely understand what and how you are trying to do things, but have you tried running the graphical calcview in SQL execution mode?

      For a better discussion of your problem, please open a question with your model case.