Skip to Content
Author's profile photo Former Member

vSAP Fiori for SAP ERP HCM 1.0 – SP03 & notes applicable

SAP Fiori for SAP ERP HCM 1.0  SPS03 is available now. Help documentation can be found here.


Package consists of 12 Fiori applications inclusive of the new apps My Time Events (Simplified ESS Clock-In/Out Solution), My Services and Team Services which were released with SP02.

What’s new?

My Leave Request supports additional fields and Multiple approvers.

Captue.JPG

Additional Notes to be implemented on SP03:

My Leave Request V2

OData:(On ECC System)

2217678 – HCM Fiori My Leave Request V2 : Data Dictionary: Additional Fields & Multiple Approvers.

2193429 *- HCM Fiori My Leave Request V2(OData): Additional Fields and Multiple Approvers (Part 1)

2210913 – HCM Fiori My Leave Request V2(OData): Additional Fields and Multiple Approvers (Part 2)

2221492 – My Leave Requests V2 (ODATA) Quota Information Display

2229648 – My Leave Requests V2 BADI for Work Schedule

2219123 – FIORI My Leave Request issue: Order of absence types in dropdown box


UI:(Only on Gateway System)

2169349 – My Leave Request V2 (UI) Consolidated fixes on SP02

2229178 – My Leave Requests V2 (UI) Quota Information Display

My Timesheet V2

OData

2209905 – My Timesheet V2(ODATA): Corrections on top of SP02 & SP03

2223505 – My Timesheet V2(ODATA): Consolidated fixes

2223506 – My Timesheet V2(ODATA): UDO report for note 2223505

UI:

2222962 – My Timesheet V2(UI): Consolidated fixes


My Paystubs V2

2210870 – My Paystubs V2 (ODATA) : Payresults not loading when CE is ON

2216613 – My Paystubs V2 (UI): Extension hook to hide back button

My Team Calendar

2210323 – My Team Calendar (oData) Consolidated Fixes

2208330 – My Team Calendar SP03 – Consolidated UI Fixes

Employee lookup

OData/Backend

2217129 – Employee Lookup(OData): Fixes for search.

2216302 – Employee Lookup: Error message added for invalid search input

UI:

2211283 – Employee Lookup(LaunchPad): Fixes on top of SP03

2210525 – Employee Lookup(Launchpad):Consolidated fixes on top of SP02 [released after SP03]

Other apps don’t have any additional notes as of now.

Note:

* while installing 2193429 note you may get syntax errors for activating data object “IS_REQUEST“, “LS_CUSTOMIZING“, “LS_LEAVE_REQUEST” like shown below:

/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/error_810668.jpg

Action to be taken: Activate anyway, since this is because of DDIC changes. once you apply notes 2193429 and 2210913 you will not have any errors.

Assigned Tags

      13 Comments
      You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.
      Author's profile photo Richard Harnwell
      Richard Harnwell

      This is proving a little problematic for me unfortunately.

      I've installed SP03 with no issue, then 2217678 (inc. manual report execution).

      Couldn't import 2193429 as it then showed as obsolete.

      2210913 imported OK

      2221492 errors on activation though. Looks like a few objects are missing:

      Class CL_HCM_ATTABS_REQUEST_API,Method CHECK_REQUEST

      The data object "ES_CHECKED_REQUEST" does not have a component called "DEDUCTION_INFO".

      Class CL_HCM_ATTABS_REQUEST_API,Method CHECK_REQUEST

      The data object "ES_CHECKED_REQUEST" does not have a component called "TOTAL_DEDUCTION".

      Class CL_HCM_ATTABS_REQUEST_API,Method CHECK_REQUEST

      The data object "ES_CHECKED_REQUEST" has no component called

      "TIME_UNIT_DEDUC", but there are the following components with similar

      names: "TIME_UNIT_TEXT" and "TIME_UNIT".

      Class CL_HCM_ATTABS_REQUEST_API,Method CHECK_REQUEST

      The data object "ES_CHECKED_REQUEST" has no component called

      "TIME_UNIT_TEXT_DEDUC", but there is a component called

      "TIME_UNIT_TEXT".

      Class CL_HCM_LEAVE_REQ_CREAT_DPC_EXT,Method LEAVEREQUESTCOLL_CREATE_ENTITY

      The data object "LS_LEAVE_REQUEST" does not have a component called

      "KALTG".

      Class CL_HCM_LEAVE_REQ_CREAT_DPC_EXT,Method LEAVEREQUESTCOLL_CREATE_ENTITY

      The data object "LS_LEAVE_REQUEST" has no component called "ABRTG", but

      there is a component called "ABWTG".

      Investigating that now but I'm interested to hear if anyone else has hit this issue...

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member
      Blog Post Author

      Hi Richard,

      From the above errors what I can see that note 2228410 has not been executed properly.
      This note contains report which on execution will take care of DDIC changes required for the note 2221492 .

      Author's profile photo Richard Harnwell
      Richard Harnwell

      Thank you - looks like you are correct. I notice in the instructions for that note the manual pre implement says run RP_ODATA_HCM_MLR_2228410 but the post implement says ensure RP_ODATA_HCM_LRQ_2228410 ran OK. I can't see where this second report comes from. Do you think this is a typo and should be the same name as the first?

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member
      Blog Post Author

      Hi Richard,
      Looks like its typo. Both are referring to the same report. I will inform the respective developer to change.

      Sorry for the inconvenience caused.

      Best Regards,

      Sunil

      Author's profile photo Richard Harnwell
      Richard Harnwell

      That's great, cheers. The (assumed) typo is in the attached pdf too.

      As you've been so helpful, I wonder if you could help with a followup...

      I ran the program and get one error from it:

      REPT LCOD_CONTRACT_MODULESF01 Package COD_BYD_ERP_INT does not exist

      When I search notes for that package it looks like it relates to "Sales On Demand" which we don't have. Would you expect us to have that package?

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member
      Blog Post Author

      Hi Richard,

      I am sorry that I can't comment on your new issue. This is not in the purview of my expertise.

      Best Regards,
      Sunil B N

      Author's profile photo Michael Appleby
      Michael Appleby

      Hi Richard,

      Please create a new Discussion marked as a Question.  Asking in a comment which is not directly related to clarifying the document or blog is inappropriate.  It is also not readily searchable to others who may have the same or similar problem.  Please review the documentation in the Getting Started link at the top right of each SCN page.

      Your Comment to a Blog or Document will not receive the same scrutiny from knowledgeable experts as a Discussion.  Many of those experts ignore comments on Documents.  See the Getting Started link at the top right to see the differences between Blogs, Discussions, and Documents and when each should be used.  If your question relates to a specific blog or document, put in a link to it.  With the creation of a Discussion, you will also be able to reward the Helpful and Correct Answers with points. You can also turn on notifications so that whenever someone posts to your Discussion, you will get an email of the update and its contents.

      NOTE: Getting the link is easy enough for both the author and document.  Simply MouseOver the item, Right Click, and select Copy Shortcut.  Paste it into your Discussion.  You can also click on the url after pasting.  Click on the A to expand the options and select T (on the right) to Auto-Title the url.

      Cheers, Mike (Moderator)

      SAP Technology RIG

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Hello Richard ,

      SAP has released Version 4 with corrections please implement and check .

      Regards

      Sri

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Hello ,

      I face a similar issue but to run manual changes to be implemented it says run report "RP_ODATA_HCM_LRQ_2228410" , which i can find in my system

      Can you please advice .

      Regards

      Sri

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Hi,

      Also PFB our GBX01HR details

      GBX01HR.JPG

      Regards

      Sri

      Author's profile photo Michael Appleby
      Michael Appleby

      Hi Srikanth,

      Please create a new Discussion marked as a Question.  Asking in a comment which is not directly related to clarifying the document or blog is inappropriate.  It is also not readily searchable to others who may have the same or similar problem.  Please review the documentation in the Getting Started link at the top right of each SCN page.

      Your Comment to a Blog or Document will not receive the same scrutiny from knowledgeable experts as a Discussion.  Many of those experts ignore comments on Documents.  See the Getting Started link at the top right to see the differences between Blogs, Discussions, and Documents and when each should be used.  If your question relates to a specific blog or document, put in a link to it.  With the creation of a Discussion, you will also be able to reward the Helpful and Correct Answers with points. You can also turn on notifications so that whenever someone posts to your Discussion, you will get an email of the update and its contents.

      NOTE: Getting the link is easy enough for both the author and document.  Simply MouseOver the item, Right Click, and select Copy Shortcut.  Paste it into your Discussion.  You can also click on the url after pasting.  Click on the A to expand the options and select T (on the right) to Auto-Title the url.

      Cheers, Mike (Moderator)

      SAP Technology RIG

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      I have applied all the notes related to Leave request, but I get the below error message.

      Property 'CalendarDays' of data object 'LeaveRequest' has no Internal type assigned

      Is this a know issue, I couldn't find any notes related to this.

      Would appreciate a reply

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Hello Bala ,

      Can you confirm which are the notes which you have applied .

      Regards

      Sri