Skip to Content
Author's profile photo Former Member

Strategic Freight Procurement

Business Case Scenario:

John is a transportation manager and is responsible for transportation at XYZ Ltd in Europe, a manufacturer of Chemical Products. The manufactured products are shipped regularly to the various dealer locations in US. John has to identify the logistics service providers or carriers with whom he could have a long term contract, to carry out the regular transportation. So he needs to send out a global tender to 6 – 8 carriers for his transportation requirement.

The current process is manual and tedious, with data exchange taking place in the form of MS-Excel from multiple sources starting from collecting the transportation requirement to inviting carriers, collecting responses, comparing and analyzing responses (sometimes which are non-homogeneous) and finally awarding contracts to a few carriers Since transportation costs for a company have a significant impact on the overall profitability of the company, he needs better support and Strategic Freight Procurement is probably what he needs.

Business Process:



The process starts out with John analyzing all his historical capacities, costs, trade lanes, carriers he has done business with. All this information can be obtained from the Order History present in SAP BW system.

Here, a lot of what – if analysis, forecasting and simulation can be performed. Now from the forecast values, John is aware of the various logistical parameters that will form input to the Freight Agreement RFQ.

Key Benefits:

    1) Lane/Carrier prioritization based on business rules.

    2) Insights into historical spend categories e.g. LTL v/s FTL, MOT which helps in planning future procurement.


The Freight Agreement RFQ Master can be created using multiple options

  1. From Scratch
  2. From an RFQ template
  3. From an existing expiring Agreement
  4. From Historical Data using Work list

The RFQ document is similar in structure to the Freight Agreement. The header having the most important information like your Response deadline dates,RFQ validity dates etc.

Using the Business Context Viewer side panel, the contextual information regarding the carriers John can invite carriers for his RFQ process. The carrier performance ( KPIs )  at the trade lane level can be configured based on parameters like invoice discrepancy , on time delivery , pick – up etc.

Modelling of John’s bidding requirement can be done using RFQ items where each item can represent different trade lanes, mode of transport, stage types, capacities, priority, charges and rate tables etc.

Now John can publish the RFQ to various carriers. There is also a configurable workflow process for approval here.

Key Benefits:

     1) Re-use TM master data,TCM master data and templates and objects thus simplifying the effort of implementation.

     2) Selection of carriers based on their historical performance.

     3) Output Management Integration.


The published RFQ goes out to the carriers through multiple ways: email, B2B or the collaboration portal.

In case of an email or collaboration portal the carrier can respond to the RFQ using an excel provided to him.

Upon submission, the responses undergo basic validations and integrity checks before entering the TM system. After the response deadline date John can compare all the responses.

The comparison cockpit is the place where John can compare responses for individual or several RFQ items.


This is called manual comparison which assumes infinite capacity (comparison is only based on rates). Manual comparison can be used when the data set is small and when there are no logistical constraints. The system gives the carrier ranking based on cost. There is also a possibility to have a graphical representation of rates across carriers and view/download rate comparison using an excel.

Key Benefits:

   1) Carrier ranking based on Response rates.

   2) Graphical Representation of Data helps in better understanding.


For bigger data sets (when the number of RFQ items/location pairs and carriers are very large), there would be more logistical constraints (cost, capacity, risk) based on which carrier selection/assignment of target shares needs to be performed.  This can be performed using the automated comparison.

John can choose the carriers’ responses; configure strategies and conditions (Maximum/Minimum target share for incumbent carriers, new carriers). These constraints are taken and the Cost Minimization Carrier Selection Optimizer is invoked. The optimizer proposes the ideal target share for the most optimal solution. He can also evaluate the estimated spend for the target share distribution by calling the charge calculation engine. The estimated solution spend is the approximate cost XYZ Company would incur if John were to create freight agreements with the proposed target shares. There is also a graphical representation of the estimated spend distribution across carriers. John can now create multiple spend simulations or versions by varying the constraints and invoking the optimizer.

He can finally accept the most optimal version as the preferred scenario. Alternatively he can also override the system proposed target share values.

This step could be performed per RFQ item or across RFQ items


Key Benefits

   1) Automated comparison of responses via optimizer improves Value (Cost, Service, and Risk) assessment.

   2) Insights into Projected Spend.


Award Summary: Prior to creating a freight agreement, the system provides a graphical summary of the capacity and cost distribution across carriers and trade lanes. This helps John to get insights on the capacity and spend distribution on the critical trade lanes/carriers etc.. The summary of the accepted responses for the transportation requirement is graphically represented here in three different views Award by Trade Lane, Carrier and RFQ item.

Award summ1.jpg

                                   The above figure depicts a comparison among the budget, estimated spend, historical spend for a given trade lane.

For a given trade lane we can represent an RFQ item and its responses, also what we see here is the estimate spend across carriers.

award summ 2.jpg

In the below depiction we can see the target share across carriers for the RFQ item.

award summ 3.jpg.png

Key Benefits

   1) Capacity/cost distribution across carriers for a trade lane.

   2) Capacity/cost distribution across trade lanes for a carrier.

   3) Easy insights from graphical data depicting management summary.


After John reads through the summary, he could decide either to create a freight agreement or to go to the next negotiation round.

agreement creation.jpg.png

To create the freight agreement: If the estimated solution spend is within the acceptable range of the shipper and the carriers also have agreed to comply with the terms and conditions. You can accept the preferred strategy, on doing so the confirmed capacities are calculated for the carriers based on the proposed business shares.

John can now proceed to the one-click freight agreement creation process. All the data from the carriers’ responses are replicated to the agreement.

agreement creation 2.jpg

agreement creation 3.jpg

The Freight Agreements are created and would be consumed by the Freight Order which is the Execution Document in Transportation Management.

Key Benefits:

  1) One-click Agreement Creation / Extension.

  2) Reuse Existing Agreements.

The entire SFP process is a closed loop where both the shipper and the carrier work mutually with one another.

The SFM module is available from TM 9.1.

Overall Benefits of SFP:

   1) One system with an open interface for all related processes without modification.

   2) Insight to action based on process flow (Historical Data, RFQ Preparation, Spend analysis, Award).

   3) Simple modeling of complex scenarios/packages.

   4) Powerful Simulations/What-If.

   5) Efficient information exchange with carriers/LSP.

I would be happy to receive feedback and provide any detailed information for any of the steps from 1 to 6.

Do check out the podcast session on Strategic Freight Procurement .

Assigned Tags

      You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.
      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Great stuff!

      Author's profile photo dipak mukherjee
      dipak mukherjee

      Really Good to see this.I would like to know if this process is implemented, do we really require tendering to be implemented or does this process include tendering functionality as part of it?

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Hello Dipak

      Just to clarify: the RFQ from Tendering is based on a FO. Those from SFP have a FA Master as the it base.

      Regarding your question, even thought Tendering and SFP are scenarios related to Carrier integration to the process, there´s no obligation to have both togerther.

      Best Regards, Marcelo

      Author's profile photo dipak mukherjee
      dipak mukherjee



      Also is there any specific configuration which drives the SFP process and which is not required for tendering?

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      Hi there,

      I created an  RFQ Master and have got a Problem with the Calculation Sheet part in the bottom.

      When I push the button "create calculation sheet". Nothing displays in the calculation sheet section. But if I push the button "save" there appear warning Messages that usually appear if you don't fill in the spaces in calculation Sheets.

      So it seems like. I can add a caculation sheet, but it just does not show/appear.

      Can anybody help?

      Author's profile photo Michael Appleby
      Michael Appleby

      Please create a new Discussion marked as a Question.  The Comments section of a Blog (or Document) is not the right vehicle for asking questions as the results are not easily searchable.  Once your issue is solved, a Discussion with the solution (and marked with Correct Answer) makes the results visible to others experiencing a similar problem.  If a blog or document is related, put in a link.

      NOTE: Getting the link is easy enough for both the author and Blog.  Simply MouseOver the item, Right Click, and select Copy Shortcut.  Paste it into your Discussion.  You can also click on the url after pasting.  Click on the A to expand the options and select T (on the right) to Auto-Title the url.

      Thanks, Mike (Moderator)

      SAP Technology RIG

      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member

      cool! tks for sharing

      Author's profile photo Hemes Cool
      Hemes Cool

      Great Share Buddy


      Author's profile photo Aditya Shinde
      Aditya Shinde


      We are in the process of upgrading to TM 9.5.

      Simultaneously we would like to install strategic freight procurement. Can you please guide me with the latest version and installation guide.

      Thanking in advance.


      Aditya S