Mapping and Validation issues for XML Layout 3.10 I
Hello everyone,
After you start using the XML layout 3.10 for NF-e, you might face some issues with new/old fields, like wrong mapping, wrong format or validation problems so we have created the list below with some SAP Notes that can help on that cases.
ERP SAP Notes (XX-CSC-BR-NFE):
2008167 – NF-e 3.10: Mapping Issues
2019851 – Fields obsCont and obsFisco not in XML when using layout 3.10
2021156 – NF-e 3.10 Mapping Percentage of reduction of ICMS-ST
2021965 – Fields related to volume are not loaded from BADi CL_NFE_PRINT for layout NF-e
2023027 – Wrong region version attribution
2026778 – NF-e 3.10 rejected with error code 255
2000898 – BADI CL_NFE_PRINT: New parameters OUT_REFPROC and OUT_ADD_INFO in FILL_HEADER
2034779 – Fields related to “duplicata” not loaded from mapping BAdI
2038119 – Tag vBCST filled wrongly for group ICMS90
2038292 – NF-e 3.10: Mapping Issues
2038704 – NF-e 3.10 rejection 332: Blank CNPJ in Import tags
2038751 – Field IndPres is filled incorrectly when the doctype is 1, 2 or 8
2038746 – Rejection 225 due to wrong mapping of field group entrega
2039144 – NF-e new layout 3.10 – Enhancement Note 03
2039647 – NF-e new layout 3.10 – Enhancement Note 04
2040234 – SEFAZ rejects NF-e due to missing information of importing taxes in the XML
2040397 – NF-e 3.10 – Mapping ICMS and Sub.Trib
2044070 – NF-e 3.10 – Foreign ID
2046247 – Field Final Consumer (IndFinal) is not correctily filled with one time account
GRC SAP Notes (SLL-NFE)
2000565 – Wrong format for field dhCont NF-e layout 3.10
2006972 – Acknowledgment report (NFe Outgoing 3.10): B2B processing for positive acknowle
2015850 – Legal Changes NT 2013.005 – Field vAFRMM
2017715 – Adjust validation for field indISS for NF-e 3.10
2020927 – Legal Changes NT 2013.005 – Field idEstrangeiro
2023505 – Adjust mapping for tax situation ICMS51 for NF-e 3.10
2034728 – Adjust validation of field serie in tag ide, refNF and refNFP
2036096 – XML mass download for NF-e layout 3.10
Thank you and best regards,
On behalf of Gustavo Machado
Hi there! SAP note 2038751 did not work as expected in our development system hence it was uninstalled right away.
Apart from that, the other notes are now completely implemented.
Very good article though, Thanks!
BR,
Pablo.