Release Strategy: Restrict lower users to revoke PO after the complete release by superior
Dear Friends,
I would like to share with you all a scenario which I’ve come across in ‘PO Release Strategy’, and the requirement has been met by introducing a small enhancement.
Note: There was no solution in ‘Standard SAP’ (confirmed by SAP), thus achieved the requirement thru enhancement
The Scenario:
Example: PO Release Strategy is configured for 3 level as explained below;
1st Level: L2 – Local Purchase Manager
2nd Level: L3 – Finance Manager
3rd Level: GM – General Manager (Final/Highest Level)
For the above stated release strategy the standard SAP has provided an option to the 1st and 2nd (L2 – Local Purchase Manager & Finance Manager) level approvers to revoke the purchase order, which is released completely by 3rd level (General Manager). Few business advises to restrict this functionality, as they expect the functionality should be like once the PO gets released by General Manager (final approver), neither Finance Manager nor Local Purchase Manager should have the authorization to revoke the PO, until the General Manager revokes it.
Solution:
Restricted the release authorization at the role level for the transaction code ME29N, by doing screen enhancement. Since the requirement is not achievable in standard sap (confirmed by SAP).
Steps:
- Go to transaction code ME29N–> enter purchase order number, which is waiting for release–> enter /h (debug mode) in command bar–> then click on ‘Release Strategy’ tab in PO header–>it would take you to the program ‘SAPLMERELVI–> find out for the ‘Include – lmerelvici1–>double click on the include and then go to method ‘HOTSPOT_CLICK–> write the restriction logic for the desired roles as shown in below logic.
Transaction Code: ME29N
Program Name: SAPLMERELVI
Include Program: LMERELVICI1
In Method: HOTSPOT_CLICK
Fucnctional Logic:
- Once we go to the transaction ME29N to release the PO, the program would check for the PO release status (Structure: MEPO_REL_GENERAL- FRGKX≠ R or (Just for reference: EKKO-FRGRL=X))–> if the PO is not completely released (FRGKX ≠ R) skip the process–> if the PO is released completely (FRGKX = R or (Ref: EKKO-FRGRL= ‘ ’)) go to table AGR_USERS (list of users) and check for the role–> if the user has role: ‘GM:GENERAL_MANAGER‘, allow the user to revoke the PO–> if he doesn’t has the given role, display an error message as ‘You are not Authorized to revoke the Release Strategy, until final level revokes the PO‘
ABAP Code:
IF sy-tcode = ‘ME29N’.
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_agr_users,
agr_name TYPE agr_users-agr_name,
uname TYPE agr_users-uname,
END OF ty_agr_users.
DATA : lv_user TYPE sy-uname,
it_agr TYPE TABLE OF ty_agr_users,
wa_agr TYPE ty_agr_users.
if MEPO_REL_GENERAL-FRGKX = ‘R’.
lv_user = sy-uname.
SELECT
agr_name
uname
FROM agr_users
INTO TABLE it_agr
WHERE uname = lv_user.
READ TABLE it_agr INTO wa_agr WITH KEY agr_name = ‘GM:GENERAL_MANAGER’.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ‘You are not Authorized to revoke the Release Strategy, until the final level revokes the PO’ TYPE ‘I’ .
EXIT.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
clear : lv_user,it_agr,wa_agr.
ENDIF.
Result:
Local Purchase Manager is trying to revoke a purchase order, which has already released by Finance Manager & General Manager, but system is throwing an error message, as expected.
Hope this document is clear for you and helps you in your current or future project(s) .
Thank you for reading the document .
Narayana N
Hi,
Nice document. Good...
Regards,
Ravindra
Thank you Ravindra 🙂
Nice one...however dont forget NOT to give tcode ME28 to the approvers, otherwise they can cancel the release through this tcode.
Thank you Yosea 🙂 , thanx for the suggestion. 🙂
Good effort Narayana 🙂
Thank you Rao 🙂
Dear Narayana,
Good document. The requirement was there in one of my previous projects. Must be useful for upcoming projects as well..
By the way.. you could have removed the *BREAK-POINT from the code 😆 Anyway good effort.
Regards,
Sudeep.
Good effort, keep it up.
Thank you Sudeep,
Thanks for telling, I've removed the 'BREAK-POINT' 😉
Good Job Narayana 🙂
Hi Narayana,
Good doc. May be useful in future developments.
Keep it up!
Regards,
Jinal Patel
Hi Mr.Narayana,
Too good...
Regards,
Dhamotharan.R.
Thank you Patel & Dhamotharan for your comments 🙂
Regards,
Narayana N
Nice document Narayana.
Regards,
Sri
Hello Narayana,
Nice Idea Keep it up...
Regards
Balaraju Muddam
Very helpful doc. Thanks for sharing the info.
Dear Krish Sri, bala raju, SAP FC
Thank you for the comments 🙂
Regards.
Narayana Nagaraju
very useful document !! 🙂
Good One!
Best Regards,
Swapnil
Good one..
Thanks
Vasuki
Hi!
Nice document.
Thanks.
Nice Document. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks & Regards,
AKPT
Thanks Narayana. Useful document.
Regards.
Satish.
@ Mukesh Kumar, Swapnil nevrekar, Vasuki B S, VINOTH VENKAT, AKPT MM, Satish Patanka thank you all 🙂
Thanks & Regards,
Narayana Nagaraju
Nice Document
How do we proceed if instead of waiting final approval to restrict users, the revoke stays impossible when my direct superior already approved the PO.
In you example, if Finance Manager already approved PO, local purchase manager should not be able to revoke PO.
Thanks for your help.
Hi Patrick,
Sorry for the delay in response.
If you are looking for such an enhancement, please follow the below procedure to achieve it. The method is better in terms of flexibility and for compatibility.
Please let me know, if you require any clarification.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayana N
Hi Narayana,
Wow, what a document! very well explained 🙂 . The language and the flow is really understandable easily. Thanks a lot for sharing such a nice document 🙂
Keep sharing your knowledge.
Best Regards.
Pavithra
Thank you Pavithra 🙂
Thanks & Regards,
Narayana N
Nice Document Narayana 🙂
Super................
Hi Narayana,
Nice Document & very clear explanation with screenshots.
Thanks
Ravinder
Hi Narayana,
Could you please help me how to add this solution to release cancellation through ME28 (ALV).
Hi ismaile samy,
The procedure is almost same, but I would advise you to get clear understanding of your business requirement, and if the requirement is same as this document, sit with your abaper and ask him to implement the given solution by finding the right spot for the transaction ME28.
If you require any assistance on any specific question, please do let me know.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayana N
Hi Niryana N, I have the same requirement as above for ME28 transaction, I am unable to find the enhancement point for this requirement. Can you please guide how to implement the same solution in transaction me28.
Good one