Abstract
At this juncture of world economy; all the leading companies across industry groups financial, health care, consumer/industry goods, service, technology and utilities are opting for a template enterprise solution that can support their global operations. However global rollouts of a template ERP solution involves a vast array of “moving parts”—before, during and after go-live – and as a result it presents unique risks in each phase.
It is essential to carefully plan and prepare to handle these risks, to ensure smooth & successful rollout of a template ERP solution.
Based on rollouts carried out in various countries, this whitepaper presents the key risk areas in global rollouts that can jeopardize the effective rollout of a template. This paper analyses in detail the impact of these risks and provides strategies based on real-life lessons learnt to proactively manage and control these risks.
It also evaluates various factors which influence the probability of each of these risks and hence the overall risk level of a rollout. Recognizing and acknowledging the factors while planning for a rollout, will support improvements in assessing the severity of the various rollout risks and help development of a comprehensive risk mitigation plan before beginning the rollout journey.
Companies around the globe; aspiring to capitalize on the promise of global markets, have identified that they need something that goes beyond the possibilities provided by silo/fragmented ERP Systems. In their pursuit, companies have recognized that a “Template ERP Solution” is the key to propel their aspirations.
But though the advantages experienced due to “Template ERP Solution” are clearly many and are visible in reduction in operational cost, improvement in operational performance and global visibility into operations; the path to achieve it is massive and complex in nature.
Implementing a “Template ERP Solution” can be broken into two major phases, one is the definition of a “Global Solution” which is the “Template” and the second is to roll out the “Template” to various geographies/markets.
This paper talks about the key risks in template rollouts.
The ISO 31000 (2009) / ISO Guide 73:2002 defines risks as the 'effect of uncertainty on objectives'. In this definition, uncertainties include events (which may or may not happen) and uncertainties caused by ambiguity or a lack of information.
According to Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR), risk is the probable frequency and probable magnitude of future loss.
To put this in simple perspective, risk is everything which will make a project costly or cause delays and failure.
On the basis of our experience of global ERP rollouts done across various industry groups, we have identified following major risk areas that if not addressed in proactive timely manner can jeopardize the successful rollout of template
Approximate percentage contribution of these risks areas, to the total rollout risk is represented in below figure
Figure – 1: Risk Areas
Some of the risks identified result in reduction in the quality of a rollout, where as some others affect the project budget or the project schedule. For the risk areas identified, it is essential to do the risk assessment considering the following areas of impact:
The risks areas mentioned above have been explained below along suggested strategies which can be used to either reduce the impactor avoid them completely during the course of the project life cycle.
Given the diversity of business processes across markets and the size and complexity of the initiative, a clear scope is critical to create a strong rollout plan that keeps the effort on track.
Absence of well-defined tightly controlled scope definition measures can lead to delays, incorrect effort estimates and frequent change requests during and after the rollout. A changing scope not only hampers the projects timelines, cost and quality but also makes the template weak as many local requirements are added to the template.
To alleviate the above risks, an expansive and robust template governance model is required that safeguards the content of the globally defined template and oversees the scope definition during rollouts.
Suggested strategies for template management and scope control:
The core team of process experts should have a rich experience in the particular industry vertical and need to provide their expertise in process validation and “fit/gap” analysis. They are accountable to align the rollout requirements with the template design and oversee the design and sign-off on of any deviations during rollouts.
To execute a project in a minimum time frame, in budget and with no compromise to quality requires a champion template along with necessary tools and accelerators which will speed up the internal phase of the project. Not having a well-defined template along with right set of accelerators will lead to higher rollout turn-around time which invariably leads to higher efforts and eventually higher cost of each subsequent rollout of the same template.
To mitigate the above risks, a well-defined methodology needs to be in place for template definition, which ensures that the template is comprehensive, solid and verified to guarantee globally harmonized processes.
Suggested strategies for making a template ready for global rollouts:
Lack / limited availability of skilled process owners and frequent change of participating personnel from local rollout site can also jeopardize the project in many ways. This can lead to delays in the process due to discontinuity at process knowledge or worse can even lead to incorrect understanding of the business process by the rollout team or by rollout site. The effect is cascading and leads to scope creep at later stage of project or definition of a sub-optimal solution, which could endanger the business efficiency for the local market and might also result in resistance/ not-acceptance of the rollout by the local rollout site users.
Ambiguous definition of roles and responsibilities for any stakeholder or between different vendors working on same rollout; is also a major setback to a project of this magnitude, as it can lead to lack of ownership and confusion towards project deliverable.
To circumvent the above risks, it is recommended for a company to have clear roles & responsibility defined for the project team, business stakeholders and the IT organization, clear identification of tasks per phase or role & clear accountability for each task. Along with demarcation of roles and responsibilities, the domain areas of various key stakeholders also should be defined initially, as this prevents conflict and speeds up the requirement gathering, reviews and sign-off of the rollout.
Also to support requirement gathering, reviews and sign-off throughout the rollout and to ensure a successful implementation, the local rollout location should commit to availability & continuous involvement of adequate number of dedicated, knowledgeable SPOCs.
Suggested strategies for doing the same:
Lack of knowledge management could lead to slow acceptance of the solution and can cause following issues:
Resistance to change is one of the major reasons for failure of global rollouts. Hence it is recommended that timely & regular organization change management communications are provided to business users and end users. It is essential to make all the stakeholders aware of the change, and engage them in a way to ensure their commitment.
Suggested strategies for ensuring change acceptance:
In the realization phase lack of training to the users for carrying out testing and verification activities can result in undetected escape of defects and can compromise software quality. Untrained or poorly trained end users lead to significant process related understanding issues post Go-live thereby impacting business productivity of the market. All the users should be exposed to the new system look and feel right from the starting of the project which gives them the exposure to the new system and time to absorb the changes.
Training should be given as high the rating in the project planning as is requirement gathering or testing.
Suggested strategies for ensuring user enablement:
During the post Go-live phase improper enablement of second level support can delay issue response and impact SLA performance. A well-tuned second level and a successful transition are as critical as the Go-live. The confidence of the end users is maintained if the quality and knowledge standards are at least maintained in the post Go-live phase.
Suggested strategies for ensuring effective knowledge transition:
Though all the above stated risks have a major impact on the success of a rollout implementation; there are various factors which influence the probability of each of these risks and hence the overall risk level of the rollout.
Companies should recognize and acknowledge these factors as they plan their rollouts, because only then they can assess the severity of the various rollout risks and will be equipped to develop a comprehensive risk mitigation plan before beginning the rollout journey.
Companies that are rolling out the template tohomogenous markets, will find it easier to define and roll out the standard solution to various geographies, and will realize quick rollout turn-around time.
However more the geographic areas, business units and legal entities involved in the global deployment, then more would be the diversity of business processes and such companies will face significant challenges in standardizing even when using a robust enabler such as a global ERP solution. Defining scope of the project can be a major challenge, which can affect timelines, effort & cost of the project.
In case of vast differences in culture and languages in countries the template is being rolled out, activities such as training and support are also affected.
Companies that have a highly centralized structure - will have the existing framework and organization mindset necessary to quickly gain agreement on critical aspects of the initiative.
However, companies that are with an autonomous management structure will experience a greater challenge in implementing the standardized processes and governance a global ERP solution requires—which causes a higher risk for the rollout.
Companies that have a single vendor deploying the solution across the globe - will get benefits of scale, easy governance and will profit from application of consistent rollout methodology across different rollout projects. But they may possibly suffer from being highly dependent on a single supplier, as they would be putting all their eggs in one basket.
However, when companies have multiple vendors deploying same template across different geographies, different rollout methodology may be used in each rollout, thus increasing the complexity of a rollout. Having different vendor teams spread across the globe, working in different time zones and also on different rollout projects at a given time, can also cause issues with knowledge transition and alignment to the template.
Companies that have a highly homogeneous IT Landscape - will substantially be able to reduce the rollout turnaround time, as the effort of identifying, harmonizing and cleansing the enterprise data in the existing system and converting it to the new solution will be standardized and quick.
However, companies that have a diverse IT landscape, the data will exist in various locations and databases, in different formats and languages, and converting it to the new solution would be a bigger challenge.
Companies need to understand the complexity of a rollout, and accordingly allocate the necessary people, time & money for the rollout. Right balance between cost and time of deployment, ultimately affects the success of a rollout.
In the below graph we have tried to capture the essence of the factors with respect to their influence on the risk areas. Higher the risk lines cut the axis of the factors, more the impact of that factor on the various risk areas.
For example: The factor “Business Process Diversity” has maximum impact on risk areas like Skills and Knowledge management. However risk area scope control is mostly influenced by factor “Business unit autonomy”.
Table 2: Impact of rollout factors on various risks
As companies pursue a ‘Global template ERP Solution’, they should be mindful of the risk areas we described, and right at the outset of a rollout, should carefully prioritize these risks considering the various factors defined in this paper.
By carefully planning for these risks, companies can dodge many of the problems associated with global rollouts, keep their rollouts within budget and on time, and implement a best-fit solution that can serve as a catalyst to business efficiency and growth.
About the authors
Navdeep Singh Sandhu
Navdeep is a Senior Consultant in the Manufacturing SAP practice of Infosys. He has over 6 years of global consulting experience.
He has been part of 4 global SAP rollouts, and has worked with established companies in the Automotive and FMCG industries.
Navdeep holds an MBA in Marketing & Operations from LBSIM Delhi, India and Electronics and Instrumentation engineering degree from MDU University, India.
Anuradha Sultane
Anuradha is a Consultant in the Manufacturing SAP practice of Infosys. She has over 3 years of global consulting experience and overall 6 years of IT experience.
She has been part of 3 global SAP rollouts, and has worked with established companies in the Finance, Automotive & FMCG industries.
Anuradha holds an MBA in Finance & Marketing from SDMIMD Mysore, India and Information Technology engineering degree from Cht. Shivaji University Kolhapur, India
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 |