X-components Antivia Part-2
Hi,
Lets try out X-Scorecard.
XScorecard also helps to show the hierarchical data elements in a grid like structure with the corresponding values against each one. Also there are options to select a value and link it to another component. Lets try out the below data. Here we are considering regions divided into countries and the medals they won in various games. The selected value marked in red has been linked to the grid component shown below, which will display the selected value in the score card.
| Region | Sub Region | Sub-sub | Medals – IceHockey | Alphine Skiing | Selected Value | ||
| America | North America | USA | 2 | 8 | selected value | ||
| America | North America | CANADA | 2 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Nordics | Finland | 2 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Nordics | Sweden | 0 | 2 | |||
| Europe | Nordics | Norway | 0 | 4 | |||
| Europe | Nordics | Denmark | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Western Europe | Great Britain | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Western Europe | France | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Western Europe | Netherlands | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Western Europe | Germany | 0 | 3 | |||
| Europe | Western Europe | Belgium | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Western Europe | Liechtenstein | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Western Europe | Luxembourg | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Central Europe | Czech Republic | 0 | 1 | |||
| Europe | Central Europe | Austria | 0 | 4 | |||
| Europe | Central Europe | Switzerland | 0 | 3 | |||
| Europe | Central Europe | Hungary | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Mediterranean | Italy | 0 | 1 | |||
| Europe | Mediterranean | Croatia | 0 | 2 | |||
| Europe | Mediterranean | Spain | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Eastern Europe | Estonia | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Eastern Europe | Slovenia | 0 | 2 | |||
| Europe | Eastern Europe | Ukraine | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Eastern Europe | Bulgaria | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Eastern Europe | Poland | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Eastern Europe | Romania | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Eastern Europe | Latvia | 0 | 0 | |||
| Europe | Eastern Europe | Slovakia | 0 | 0 | |||
| Asia | Russia | Russia | 0 | 0 | |||
| Asia | Eastern Asia | Japan | 0 | 0 | |||
| Asia | Eastern Asia | China | 0 | 0 | |||
| Asia | Eastern Asia | North Korea | 0 | 0 | |||
| Asia | Eastern Asia | South Korea | 0 | 0 | |||
| Asia | Central Asia | Belarus | 0 | 0 | |||
| Asia | Central Asia | Kazakhstan | 0 | 0 | |||
| Asia | Central Asia | Uzbekistan | 0 | 0 | |||
| Australia & Oceanica | Australia | Australia | 0 | 0 | |||
| Australia & Oceanica | NewZealand | NewZealand | 0 | 0 | |||
Drawbacks
1. This is a third party component and hence SAP doesn’t provide any support to these.
2. When there is a duplicate entry in the second level ie
| Country1 | State1 |
| Country1 | State2 |
| Country2 | State1 |
| Country2 | State2 |
| Country3 | State1 |
| Country4 | State1 |
| State1 | District1 |
| State1 | District2 |
| State2 | District1 |
| State2 | District2 |
State1 is the child of Country 1 and Country2, so the childs of state1 cannot be identified by the tree and they will map district1 and district2 in the 1st occurance of state1 which is under country1.
3. you should know the length of your hierarachy, otherwise the scroll bar will appear.
Thanks,
Meera 🙂
informative.. 🙂