Recently Released PY-IN Notes:1952523 – HINCALC0: /4MI inconsistent in rehire retro scenarios / 1950425 – HINCALC0: Section 80GGA of Income Tax Act Still Valid / 1942663 – HINCALC0 : Employee NPS Contribution
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Note Number | 1952523 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 3 |
| Validity | 17.01.2014 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.01.2014 13:25:38 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing PC00_M40_CALC for rehired employees in your organization. Due to some master data changes retro is being trigerred in such scenarios.In such cases the /4MI calculation is inconsistent for rehire cases
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1950425 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Validity | 08.01.2014 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 15.01.2014 09:15:54 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Section 80GGA (i.e.,Donation for Scientific/Rural Devlpmnt) of Income Tax Act Still Valid and is not being shown in Section 80 deductions.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1942663 |
| Topic | Employee NPS Contribution |
| Version | 1 |
| Validity | 19.11.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 17.01.2014 12:02:48 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
As per the Income Tax Act, deduction in respect of contribution to pension scheme of Central Government (NPS) is applicable to government employees, private employees and a non-employee (self-employed) individual. This benefit is for payment or deposit of any amount in his account under a pension scheme notified or as may be notified by the Central Government within a limit of ten per cent of his salary.
Contribution to NPS is categorized as:
1. Employee Contribution [80CCD(1)]
2. Employer Contribution [80CCD(2)]
Computation of employee monthly NPS contribution and the respective deduction was not part of standard SAP system.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1957375 |
| Topic | Inconsistent Ptax calculation for the region of MP in case of employee’s leaving |
| Version | 2 |
| Validity | 31.12.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 16.01.2014 15:46:58 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for all the employees working in your organization.
In case when an employee is leaving in mid-year belonging to the region MP, professional tax is calculated inconsistently in the leaving period. This is found inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
|
Note Number |
1960774 |
|
Topic |
Bihar & Orissa : Inclusion of Perquisites and Bonus for P-tax Computaion |
|
Version |
1 |
|
Validity |
02.01.2014 |
|
Reason and Prerequisites |
Program error |
|
Release Status |
Released for Customer |
|
Released on |
08.01.2014 09:59:47 |
|
Priority |
Correction with medium priority |
As per new legal change, for Professional Tax calculation for state of Bihar and Orissa, Perquisites and Bonus amount needs to be added into Professional Tax Basis .
For reference:
Consider that a person is employed in Bihar and has a salary of Rs. 40000.00 per month and perquisites of Rs. 50,000 annuallly is given to him, in the current financial year 2013-14. Annual basis for PTax will be calculated as 5,30,000.00 (12*40000 + 50,000) in the month of September. As per the slabs, PTax deduction will be Rs. 2000/-
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1922357 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Validity | 19.12.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 06.01.2014 10:03:09 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing Payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) to run payroll for employees working in your organization.
While you are executing payroll retrospectively, the ESI employee contribution gets reverted for earlier periods. This behavior is inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1942369 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Validity | 02.01.2014 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 02.01.2014 09:05:24 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While generating Form PT-IV for region bihar (Tcode: PC00_M40_PTX) for employees working in your organization, basis for ptax is blank even though ptax amount has been deducted for the employee. The basis amount does not appear on the report in case, there is a retrospective run performed for September period.
For reference:
Employee ‘X’ has his ptax basis as 30,000 per month. In the month of September, his annual ptax basis is determined and ptax amount is deducted. In October, due to certain reason, a retrospective run has been performed effective April. Now, when ptax report (Tcode: PC00_M40_PTX) is executed for generating Form PT-IV for employee ‘X’, basis amount displayed is blank, however, ptax amount deducted is displayed. This is incorrect.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1933629 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 09.12.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 19.12.2013 12:37:38 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing t-code PC00_M40_CALC for the employees in your organisation. Alv is genearated for the employees and you have downloaded the E-file for validating with FVU 4.0 . When you validate the file for mid-year joinee employees then the validation utility throws an error.
Example :
If you have an employee hired on 12.04.2013 and you have downloaded the E-file for the employee using F24q utility report. You validate the E-file with FVU 4.0 then the system throws an error
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1957105 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 18.12.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.12.2013 11:27:08 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
If retroactive payroll is executed for a period for which no original pay results exists, then superannuation contribution is inconsistance
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1944597 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 7 |
| Valid since | 14.12.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 16.12.2013 09:53:56 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are exectuing t-code PC00_M40_ESI for employees in your company.
In a scenario where you generate the New Form 6 for all employees based on the payroll area then employees are repeated in the ALV display. This behavior of the report is inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1933737 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 09.12.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 10.12.2013 04:52:26 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
The inconsistency described under Symptom is resolved.
To get the changes,apply the HR Support Package(s) indicated for your release in the ‘Reference to Support Packages’ section of this note.
Alternatively, apply the correction instructions attached to this note
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1890531 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 4 |
| Valid since | 29.10.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.11.2013 10:05:24 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
This note contains changes related to Form 217.
The existing system behavior for form 217 report involves all the wage types that form 217 basis. Evaluation class ’11’ is set for all the wage types which forms 217 basis. With this setup the system checks for all the wage types in the cluster for each period of the run. This is creating long time exection of the re
New : PCR – IN38 , IN39, Z217
Wage Types – /A38 , /Z38, M38B
Change : Schema – ZNNR PCR- IN44 IN54
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1936187 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 06.11.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 15.11.2013 20:07:59 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
As per legal, bonuses/perquisites need to be included for basis calculation for the state of Orissa.
This note includes changes for Orissa Professional Tax with inclusion of bonus/perquisites.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1936835 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 15.11.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 15.11.2013 11:21:59 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
If an individual declares investment towards the payment of health insurance premiums, he/she qualify for the tax deduction under section 80D in infotype 0585.
Following are the possible senarios under which one can show his/her investments :
1. Medical Insr Premium (Non-Senior Citizen) Employee : self, spouse and children
2. Medical Insr Premium (Senior Citizen) Employee : self, spouse and children
3. Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents non-senior Citz) : Parents
4. Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents senior Ctz) : Parents
As per the Government of India, an individual can not declare the investment towards senario 1 and senario 2 together i.e an individual can declare investment either towards “Medical Insr Premium (Non-Senior Citizen) Employee” or towards “Medical Insr Premium (Senior Citizen) Employee”. But declaration towards any one of these to is allowed.
Similarly an individual can not declare the investment towards senario 3 and senario 4 together i.e an individual can declare investment either towards ” Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents non-senior Citizen)” or towards “Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents senior Ctz)”. But declaration towards any one of these to is allowed.
Currently there is no such validation in infotype 0585 , which is incorrect.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1928279 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 6 |
| Valid since | 25.10.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 28.10.2013 11:47:30 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) to run payroll for the employees working in your organization.
In case of cross financial retro, the value of /3I1 and /3I2 in section 89 calculation is found inconsistent
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1927455 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 17.10.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 25.10.2013 09:54:13 |
| Priority | Correction with low priority |
For the employees in your organisation you have maintianed the infotype IT0582. Now you have set the lock indiactor for the records maitained in the infotype. When you open the data in View mode to check the data, lock indicator symbol is not being displayed. The system behaves inconsistently.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1918405 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 26.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Advance development |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 21.10.2013 10:51:33 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Aadhaar is a 12 digit individual unique identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India on behalf of the Government of India.
Till now in SAP system this information cannot be stored in SAP system.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1915902 |
| Topic | HINCALC0: Inconsistency in Chapter VI /432 calculation |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 17.10.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.10.2013 04:41:14 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0(TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization.
In case of retrospective run across financial year, inconsistency is observed in /432 calculation.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1904801 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 16.10.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 16.10.2013 09:28:32 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While you are terminating an employee through termination workbench (Tcode: PC00_M40_TERM), the date on which employee has resigned is not included in the notice period. Due to this the ‘Notice Pay’ calculated for the employee becomes incorrect.
For reference:
Employee ‘X’ resigns the organization on 31.05.2013. Notice period for the employee is 30 days. When employee is terminated through termination workbench, the actual leaving date for employee is determined as 30.06.2013, however, it should be 29.06.2013 (including the day on which employee resigns). Due to this, notice pay is calculated incorrectly.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1920198 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 11.10.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 11.10.2013 11:52:09 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
A new File Validation Utility (FVU) version 4.0 has been released by the Government of India, for validating the e-files generated through Form 24Q.
The FVU version 4.0 needs to be used effective October 2013.
Following changes have been incorporated as per the features of FVU version 4.0:
1. ‘Token No. of Prev. Statement’ field has been provided on the selection screen of report, so as to enter the ‘Token no. of previous regular statement (Form no. 24Q)’ provided to the employers, whenever necessary.
2.‘Whether regular statement for Form 24Q filed for earlier period’ field will be populated with value either ‘N’ or ‘Y’.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 10.10.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Advance development |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 11.10.2013 06:46:35 |
| Priority | Correction with low priority |
Currently, in the standard system, if you execute correction payroll run for employees with
- Correction run functionality switched on
- Multiple Form 16 switched off
there is an inconsistency in payroll results.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1918284 |
| Topic | FVU 3.8: Batch, Challan and Deductee Details Not Displayed |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 01.10.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 01.10.2013 06:00:00 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While generating Form 24Q (Tcode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for employees working in your organization, batch header details, challan details and deductee details are not being displayed in the downloaded file. The values are not displayed in the ‘Display e-file’ tab as well.
Note: This inconsistency is observed only for ECC 6.0 release.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1917140 |
| Topic | Form 24Q : FVU version 3.9 ( changes in /4MI ) |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 24.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal Change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 30.09.2013 08:09:52 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
The Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue), (Central Board of Direct Taxes), has introduced the new version (3.9) of File Validation Utility ( FVU). Due to which modifications are done in form 24Q for ANNEXURE I.
This note delivers the changes needed to address the legal changedescribed in symptom section.
Note : Field Monthly Taxable Amount” is now changed to “Monthly Amount Paid/Credited”, in order to incorporate same in Form 24Q, changes are done in the calculation logic of wage type /4MI.
Changes are done behind constant ‘INMWT’. As per standard SAP delivery value ‘0’ is being used for /4MI recalculation and the same is being used in other reports as well.
Prerequisite Support Package.
604 – SAPK-60459INSAPHRCIN
600 – SAPK-60093INSAPHRCIN
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
|
Note Number
|
1915100 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 19.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Announcement of Legal Change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 19.09.2013 06:09:41 |
| Priority |
Government of India has release a new File Validation Utility version 3.9 to validate the new Form 24Q file format. According to this it has been established that in the Annexure I of Form 24Q, “Amount paid/Credited” has to be reported against “Taxable amount of which tax deducted”
Solution
The Annexure I of Form 24Q was reporting total taxable income. NSDL has released an FVU 3.9, according to which it has been establised that the for the deductee details (Form 24Q – Annexure I), name of the field “Taxable amount of which tax deducted” has been changed to “Amount paid/Credited”.
Therefore SAP will now report the Gross income (/416) of the employee in Annexure I instead of the total taxable income (/434) NSDL has also clarified that the “Taxable amount on which tax deducted” in Deductee details in all four quarters need not match with the “Total Taxable income” figure shown in the Annexure II (salary details)
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1911926 |
| Topic | PrevEmp: Addition of bonus payment from Prev Fin Year’s |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 19.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Advance development |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 19.09.2013 10:23:09 |
| Priority |
Previous employment data in SAP is reported in IT0580 and this infotype is primarily used when the employee is reporting income from previous employer with whom he was employed previously but within the same financial year.
If an employee is hired in 1st of Financial year/ he is an exsiting employee then IT0580 does not allow you maintian the Previous employment details. In such an scenario if any bonus payment coming from across financial year needs to be reported in current financial year needs to be captured and stored for payroll processing.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1913768 |
| Topic | HINCF24Q : Sec80 values repeated in AnnII for 4th Quarter |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 18.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.09.2013 07:06:59 |
| Priority |
You are executing t-code PC00_M40_F24Q for employees in your company.
In a scenario where you have maintained the Sec80C entries for multiple employees and you executing the 4th quarter. Then the Sec80C values displayed in Annuxure II (Salary and Details) tab under the column head ‘Ded sec 80C,80CCC,80CCD(1)’ is getting repeated.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1911305 |
| Topic | ECR : PF details should be blank in case of Exempted Trust |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 11.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.09.2013 11:27:49 |
| Priority |
While you are trying to generate ECR (Transaction PC00_M40_EPF) for employees in your organization, if employee is contributing towards an Exempted Trust, only pension details need to be displayed on ECR. PF details are to be left blank for such cases.
For referance
Employee ‘X’ in contributing towards an exempted trust. While you generate ECR for such an employee, only pension details need to be displayed on ECR, PF details are to be left blank in such case.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1913280 |
| Topic | Income Tax Calc. & Leave Encashment Exem. in Case of Death |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 16.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Advance development |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 16.09.2013 11:45:52 |
| Priority |
While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for employees working in your organization, if the employee has died before completing senior or very senior citizen age, income tax is getting calculated incorrectly.
For senior and very senior citizens, separate income tax slabs apply for tax calculation. However, these slabs are applicable in case employee reaches a certain age as defined by the Government. If an employee dies before he reaches the senior/ very senior citizen age, the system still calculates tax as per senior/ very senior slabs. This behavior is incorrect.
For reference:Employee ‘X’ reaches 60 years (Sr. citizen) of age on 01.09.2013 and he dies on 31.05.2013. In this case, when payroll is run for May 2013, income tax is being calculated with slabs used for senior citizen. This is incorrect, as the employee died before he completed 60 years of age.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1908283 |
| Topic | HINCALC0: Inconsistent ptax deduction with split records |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 03.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 10.09.2013 05:22:46 |
| Priority |
You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU), for the employees working in your organization.
Inconsistent professional tax deduction is observed in case of retrospective run when there is a change in organizational assignment from the past periods.
Reference:
Employee’s payroll has been run till August month. In the month of September there is an organizational change in IT0001, effective from August. When September’s payroll is run, the professional tax deduction for the month of august is found inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1890113 |
| Topic | HINCALC0: Inconsistent ptax deduction with split records |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 04.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 10.09.2013 05:22:26 |
| Priority |
You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU), for the employees working in your organization.
Inconsistent professional tax deduction is observed in case of retrospective run when there is a change in organizational assignment from the past periods.
Reference:
Employee’s payroll has been run till August month. In the month of September there is an organizational change in IT0001, effective from August. When September’s payroll is run, the professional tax deduction for the month of august is found inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1893035 |
| Topic | HINUCMAP: Dumps if IT0185 subtypes are maintained as char |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 05.09.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 05.09.2013 04:17:06 |
| Priority |
When you execute the t-code PC00_M40_CMAP for employees of your organisation, and if you are using subtypes which are of character type. Then on executing the challan mapping program, system displays a short dump.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1902268 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 20.08.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 29.08.2013 09:31:04 |
| Priority |
Professional Tax for the state of Sikkim has been introduced. The professional tax liability is computed on monthly basis and the deduction by the employer happens on a monthly basis.
For Professional Tax computation, new slabs and corresponding deduction amounts have been introduced by the Sikkim Government. Professional Tax basis is computed monthly and subsequently, Professional Tax deductions are made in each month. Professional Tax slab for Sikkim are as follows:
| Monthly Salary or Wages | Tax Per Month |
| Upto 20,000 | NIL |
| From 20,001 to 30,000 | 125 |
| From 30,001 to 40,000 | 150 |
| From 40,001 to 99,99,999 | 200 |
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1905233 |
| Topic | Manipur Professional Tax |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 28.08.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 28.08.2013 11:11:05 |
| Priority |
Professional Tax for the state of Manipur has been introduced effective from April 2013. The professional tax liability is computed on an annual basis and the deduction by the employer happens on a monthly basis.
For Professional Tax computation, new slabs and corresponding deduction amounts have been introduced by the Manipur Government. Professional Tax Basis is computed annually (using projection) and Professional Tax deductions are made in each month.
Professional Tax slab for Manipur are as follows:
| Annual Salary or Wages | Tax Per Year |
| Upto 50,000 | NIL |
| From 50,001 to 75,000 | 1200 |
| From 75,001 to 1,00,000 | 2000 |
| From 1,00,001 to 1,25,000 | 2400 |
| Above 1,25,000 | 2500 |
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1901554 |
| Topic | HINCEPF0: Negative Arrears on ECR |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 23.08.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 23.08.2013 10:16:48 |
| Priority |
While generating electronic challan *** return (ECR) for EPFO (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF), in case employee have certain negative arrears following inconsistencies have been observe
1. Negative arrears are also displayed as positive arrear
2. No way to determine which of the arrears are positive or which are negative
For reference:
Employee ‘X’ had certain PF contribution of INR 1500 in the month of April. Due to certain retrospective run, it comes out that PF contribution for the month of April should have been INR 1400. For, such cases there is a delta of INR 100 (negative), which is displayed on ECR as INR 100 (positive). This is incorrect
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1901070 |
| Topic | IT0584 – Field Length and Short term capital gains |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 16.08.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Advance development |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 22.08.2013 08:43:01 |
| Priority |
In order to record income from other sources for an employee, subtype 0002 of infotype 0584 is maintained. However the following were not available:
1. In ‘TDS on other income’ field it is not possible to maintain amount more than 99 lacs.
2. There is no field to capture ‘Short Term Capital gains from listed securities
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1895518 |
| Topic | Loans – Approver Scenario dump |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 12.08.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 12.08.2013 08:29:18 |
| Priority |
You are using Employee Self Service (ESS) based Loans application for employees in your organization.
However, it is being observed that while the approver tries to open the application from Universal work list, dump occurs.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1897219 |
| Topic | NPS: Inconsistent NPS Calculation For Nominal Projection |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are executing payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization who are eligible for new pension scheme having Provident Fund Contribution infotype (IT0587) maintained accordingly.
You are having Nominal Basis of projection for your payroll calculation.On execution of payroll, it is observed that the NPS amount is not getting considered for projection and hence there is inconsistency in tax computation.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1893219 |
| Topic | HINIDAB0: Variable DA amounts incorrectly updated |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are updating Dearness allowance details for the employees (using transaction PC00_M40_DAB). In such a case, the DA amounts are incorrectly getting calculated.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1886576 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Legal change |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
A new version (version 3.8), of File Validation Utility (FVU) has been released by the Government of India on 29th June 2013. There has been changes to the format of the e-filling format for 1st to 3rd Quarter and 4th Quarter.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1888029 |
| Topic | HINCF24Q: Period parameter error during runtime |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are executing Form 24Q report HINCF24Q (TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.
While execution, a runtime error occurs with the following message ‘Period parameters for payroll area not available’.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1887039 |
| Topic | Short Dump During Deferred Loans Computations |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You have activated deferred loans functionality in your system by activating switch HRLOCIN_SFWS_SC_03.
While executing payroll for employees having loan record a short dump is being observed in last period of loan recovery.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1884503 |
| Topic | HINCF24Q: File Validation Utility version 3.8 |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
A new version (version 3.8), of File Validation Utility (FVU) has been released by the Government of India on 29th June 2013. File Validation Utility version 3.8 has to be used effective 1st July 2013 for validating all the quarterly files being generated through Form 24Q report (TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q).
Pre-Requisite Notes : 1863154 and 1878839
There is one file for Manual Changes
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1879500 |
| Topic | IT0007: Workhours not adjusted to new employment percentage |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
This SAP Note corrects the following symptoms:
- You use transaction PA30 (“Maintain Master Data”infotype 0007 (“Planned Working Time”) to change the “employment percentage” for one of your rs . However,as a result of the changes, the “Work hour day/week/month/year” are not adjusted to the new employment percentage.
- You use transaction PA40 (“Personnel Actions”) to perform an organizational reassignment for an employee. During the maintenance of infotype 0001 (“Organizational Assignment”, you select “Organizational Unit” in the position dialog box for copying the organizational assignment, and you enter an organizational unit. However, this organizational unit is not displayed on the detail screen of infotype 0001, and it is not saved either.
- You perform a leaving action for one of your employees, where the “Employment status” (STAT2) should be changed to 0 (“Left”). However,the “Employment status” retains the value 3
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1871365 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are executing Payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) to run payroll for employees working in your organization.
When you are running payroll for employees across financial year, the following section 89 wage types are found inconsistent.
1. /616 – Gross taxable income arrears
2. /650 – Net tax difference
3. /622 – Professional tax amount difference
4. /6I2 – Chapter VIA deduction amount difference
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1876907 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
Employees of your organization are working in North-East states where Income tax exemption under Section 10(26) is applicable.Mentioned functionality is already enabled in your system but the system is behaving incorrectly in case of some cases. for example consider the following scenarios:
1. ST Employee of any notified NE tribal area, posted in other notified tribal area will be eligible for NE Exemption only if the tribe to which employee belongs is also recognized as Scheduled Tribe (ST) in the posted area also.
2. It is not always the case, that all the ST employees of one tribal area, working in the same tribal area are eligible for NE Tax exemption.(For example all the ST employee of Assam is not eligible for NE Tax exemption).
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1853376 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are executing the ESI report HINCESI0 for the employees working in your organization.
When an employee is on unpaid leave (LOP) for an entire month, the particular employee’s record is not shown in the record output. The employee record should be shown in the output.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1878839 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
The Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue), (Central Board of Direct Taxes), has introduced the new version (3.7) of File Validation Utility ( FVU) on February 19, 2013. Due to which some modifications are done in E-file of form 24Q.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1866328 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are trying to display the section 80 deductions details using transaction PZ80.
However, the declared amount in infotype 0585 ( Section 80 Deductions ) for an employee is not showing on screen and the field is appearing blank for recently introduced sub-sections.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1826749 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 6 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are using report(HINUACRP)to display the details of Income Tax declaration requests created via ESS Income Tax declaration application.When displaying the request, requested and approved amount is not displayed consistently in the detailed screen.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1859134 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
While generating ECR (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF) for employees who are contributing towards Provident Fund, following inconsistencies have been observed:
1. Joining Date of EPF & EPS is not coming correct.
2. In ‘Relationship with the member’ field, for Husband ‘S’ should be displayed. Currently it is being displayed as ‘H’.
3. In case employee is more that 58 years, pension wages shall not appear not ECR. Currently it is displayed in few cases. This is incorrect.
Employee ‘X’ joined the EPF trust in April 2008. However, the data is present outside SAP system. You are going live in April 2012. So, the first payroll result present in system is of April 2012. When ECR is generated for 01/2012, even though employee has joined the PF trust in April 2008, date of joining is displayed as 01.04.2012. This is incorrect. The joining details for employee shall not be displayed.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1851803 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are executing ESI report (Transaction Code:PC00_M40_ESIF) for generating ESI New Form 5.
In the output form layout, there are some inconsistencies noted in both PDF and SAPSCRIPT forms in comparison with the standard form provided by Employee State Insurance Corparation.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1870928 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
While generating ESI Form 5 (TCode: PC00_M40_ESIF) for employees working in your organization who are contributing towards ESI, the Contribution dates are coming blank.
For Reference:
You have not activated Alternate Financial Year (AFY) functionality at your organization. Employee ‘X’ is contributing towards ESI. When you try to generated ESI Form 5 (Tcode: PC00_M40_ESIF), contribution dates present on the Form 5 are displayed as Blank.
Note: Symptom occurs only when AFY has not been activated.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1820601 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 7 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
You are executing claims disbursement program HINCREMP (Tcode: PC00_M40_REMP) to disburse claims for employees working in your organization.
You have disbursed certain amount & payroll has been run for that period. However, you want to disburse some more amount after the payroll has been run. When you try to disburse on the last day of such a period, the report does not allow disbursing any amount and throws an error message. This behavior is inconsistent.
Also, when the employee claims from ESS and when the admin executes the report to update infotypes (HINUINFU) after the payroll is run and the control record is in correction mode, the system does not update the infotype and throws an error. This is also found inconsistent.
For reference:
Employee is eligible for INR 10,000 in period April 2012 for a certain reimbursement. INR 5000 had been disbursed using the disbursement program. The amount is also paid to the employee when payroll is run. However, it is required to disburse another INR 5000 for period April 2012 after the payroll is run. When disbursement program is now run for last day of April 2012, an error message appears & amount would not be disbursed. This behavior is inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1870310 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 07.06.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
Claim eligibility amount is incorrect in case of change in the allowance grouping of the employee within period
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1861375 |
| Topic | Form 12BA: Layout modifications 2012-13 |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 24.05.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 24.05.2013 13:15:15 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company the Form 16 is generated for all of the employees. It consists of the form 12BA also.
There some alignment issues in the layout of the script for Form 12BA.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1857827 |
| Topic | Form 16: Dumps due to higher values in number field of WT’s |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 24.05.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 24.05.2013 12:52:29 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing the Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization and you have maintained a higher range of values for number field of wagetypes.
On executing the Form 16, system displays a short dump
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1864037 |
| Topic | Form 16AA: To display Employee no and Pan no in header |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 24.05.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 24.05.2013 12:46:31 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company for few eligible employees Form 16AA is generated.
Then the PAN, PERNR and Employee name in Form 16AA is not being displayed in the same way that is being displayed in Form 16
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1861376 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company the Form 16 is generated for all of the employees.
When you enter the form name in the Customer Layout selection and execute the same, the Sec 80C values getting duplicated and repeated in the form Layout.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1856880 |
| Topic | |
| Version |
2 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | |
| Release Status |
Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
With the new legislative changes (announced via Note 1843575), it is mandatory to generate Part A of Form No. 16 through TRACES Portal only.
These downloaded Form 16 Part A has to be then sent to employees.
There is an option required on Standard Form 16 program to send TRACES generated Form 16 Part A and the SAP system generated Form 16 Part B, in a single mail to employees.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1863154 |
| Topic | |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | |
| Reason and Prerequisites | |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | |
| Priority |
As per the notification by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue), (Central Board of Direct Taxes) dated February 19, 2013, the format of Annexure I & II on Form 24Q has undergone few modifications.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1861373 |
| Topic | Form 16: Layout modifications |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 17.05.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 21.05.2013 08:03:29 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company the Form 16 is generated for all of the employees.
There some alignment issues in the layout of the script
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1850953 |
| Topic | ESS: IT Declaration Dump While Updating Infotype 0586 |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 16.05.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 16.05.2013 12:11:51 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are using Employee Self Service (ESS) based IT Declaration application for employees in your organization.
However, it is being observed that while updating infotype 0586 for Section 80c deductions approved requests, using report ‘HINUINFU’ system throws a dump ‘CX_HRPA_INVALID_BUFFER_STACK’.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1856369 |
| Topic | HINCF24Q: Inconsistencies on Annex II |
| Version | 5 |
| Valid since | 16.05.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 16.05.2013 09:15:58 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While generating Annex-II of Form 24Q (TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q) for quarter 4, the following inconsistencies have been observed:
- When TAN based reporting has been activated and there are splits in ‘Actions’ (IT0000), ‘Organizational Assignment’ (IT0001) infotypes of employees, the system computes the end date of employment incorrectly.
- Medical exemption & section 10 exemptions from the previous employment, are getting deducted from current employment taxable income as well. This is reducing the overall tax liability for current employment, which is incorrect.
Consider that TAN based reporting has been activated at your organization. Employee ‘X’ joins the organization on 01.01.2011. Employee is active for whole of the duration; however, there are certain splits in ‘Actions’ & ‘Organizational Assignment’ infotypes. Suppose the splits are as below:
01.01.2011 – 20.08.2012 & 21.08.2012 – 31.12.9999. In such cases, ‘Date Upto’ field on Annex-II is being displayed as 20.08.2012. This is incorrect.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1855007 |
| Topic | HINCF24C: Runtime Error while consolidating files |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 09.05.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 09.05.2013 11:02:06 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing e-file consolidation program (TCode:PC00_M40_F24C) for consolidating the different e-files generated using form 24Q report (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) into a single e-file for submitting the returns to Income Tax authorities.
While trying to consolidate e-files through the e-file consolidation program for form 24Q, a runtime error is being encountered.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1844336 |
| Topic | HINCF24Q: Q4 Inconsistencies in Salary and Tax Details |
| Version | 7 |
| Valid since | 30.04.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 30.04.2013 08:20:54 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Multiple Form 16 switch has not been activated at your organization. While generating Form 24Q of quarter 4(TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q) the following inconsistencies were observed.
1. While executing for separated employees, the ‘Date From’ field is not displayed correctly
2. While executing for employees that joined in the month of January, the results are not displayed in the output of the report
3. While executing for re-hired employees, salary & tax details before rehiring are not being displayed in the output of the report
Multiple Form 16 switch has been activated at your organization.
While generating Form 24Q of quarter 4(TCode: PC00_M40_F24Q) the following inconsistencies were observed.
4. Tax payable is not rounded before being displayed on output
5. While executing for employees having certain previous employment details, chapter VI deductions are coming incorrect
For Reference:
- Employee ‘X’ joins the organization on 01.04.2011. This employee gets separated in middle of FY 2012 say, in September 2012. Multiple Form 16 switch has also not been activated at your organization. In such a case, the ‘Date From’ field on ‘Salary & Tax Details’ is being displayed as quarter begin date. However, it should be displayed as the start of FY 2012.
- Employee ‘Y’ joins the organization in the month of January 2013, where no previous payroll result exists. The employee is not liable to pay tax as his income does not fall under any tax slab rate. In this case, while executing form 24Q, the report does not pick the results of employee for the fourth quarter. The details should have been displayed in the report output.
- Employee ‘Z’ joins the organization on 01.04.2012. This employee gets separated in middle of FY 2012 say, in September 2012. In November 2012 employee is re-hired in the same organization. In such cases, salary and tax details from April 2012 to September 2012 is not being displayed in the output.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1847862 |
| Topic | New Form 16 Layout for Financial Year 2012-2013 |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 17.04.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 30.04.2013 10:16:49 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
As per the legal changes announced by the central government for financial year 2012-2013, a new layout for Form 16 has been introduced. The new layout comprises of Part A & Part B respectively.
Prerequisite: SAP Note No. 1835787. Ensure that you read and implement the manual steps and correction instructions of Note 1835787 before applying this Note.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1850965 |
| Topic | Tax Credit Amount Not Considered for Cross FY Retro Cases |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 25.04.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 25.04.2013 08:21:58 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
As per the Union Budget 2013 – 2014, for individuals having a taxable income less than 5 Lac, a tax credit of INR 2,000 would be given. While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees, when a cross financial year retro is triggered from previous year, tax credit amount is being generated. However, it is not reducing the overall tax liability of the employee. This behavior is incorrect.
For an employee ‘X’ a cross financial retro is triggered. After considering the cross FY arrears, employees’ taxable income comes out to be less than 5 Lac. In this case, a tax credit of INR 2,000 is generated. Suppose, the overall tax liability of employee ‘X’ was INR 10,000, then even after tax credit his liability remains 10,000. Tax liability for employee shall become INR 8,000 (10,000 – 2,000).
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1840856 |
| Topic | Loan Interest amount is not getting calculated correctly |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 06.04.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 15.04.2013 09:00:17 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Loan Interest Amount is not getting calculated correctly in the payroll.
This inconsistency occurs if repayment of loan is done by employee in the middle of the month or the pay date for payroll is Middle of the month
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1844277 |
| Topic | Incorrect Net Pay in case of EE Eligible for Tax Credit |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 10.04.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 12.04.2013 09:28:34 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
If you are executing payroll for an employee who is eligible for tax credit as per Section 87A, the system computes the net pay of the employee incorrectly.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1829618 |
| Topic | PY-IN: Union Budget Changes for Year 2013 |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 04.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 29.03.2013 12:54:37 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
This Note delivers the changes related to the Union Budget for 2013
This note include changes regards
1. Introduction of new section 87A (Tax Credit)
2. Introduction of new section 80EE
3. Amendment to Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Scheme (80CCG)
4. Introduction of 10% Surcharge for Individuals Earning Income over 1 Crore
5. Introduction of New Division under Section 80G
Manual steps also attached with this Note
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1839995 |
| Topic | PY-IN: Budget Changes 2013 – Surcharge Marginal Relief |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 28.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 29.03.2013 13:17:24 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
This Note delivers the corrections related to marginal relief for 10% of surcharge for Individuals earnings more than 1 Crore.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1829520 |
| Topic | Union Budget 2013 – Announcement Note |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 04.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Announcement of Legal Change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 04.03.2013 12:43:47 |
| Priority | Recommendations/additional info |
Union Budget Changes 2013
Other terms
Surcharge, Tax credit, Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings Scheme, Housing loan for first timers, Long term infrastructure bonds
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1811606 |
| Topic | Inconsistent Ptax in mid-year transfer to Jharkhand region |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 01.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 28.03.2013 05:48:58 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing payroll driver HINCALC0 (Tcode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees working in your organization in the region of Jharkhand.
While you are executing payroll, an inconsistent amount of ptax is been deducted in case of employee joining Jharkhand region in mid-year.
For Reference:
Consider a scenario, where the employee is transfered to Jharkhand region in October and is liable to pay PTax of Rs.1800 professional tax. When the payroll is run, the amount that the employee is liable to pay, gets reduced to 900 as the employee is transfered to Jharkhand in October.
So in this case, the ptax amount gets calculated as = 900 / 6 = 150.
This is observed as inconsistent behaviour. The PTax liability is dependent of the return value of the feature 40PTB.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
|
Note Number |
1835787 |
| Topic | Form 16 layout changes for financial year 2012-2013 |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 19.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 22.03.2013 08:59:50 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.
As per new legal changes for Form 16, for financial year 2012-13, the system must also display 80TTA in the Form 16 in point 9 (Deduction under chapter VIA) under “B”. This Note delivers the changes needed to address this requirement/change.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1825593 |
| Topic | HINUINFU: IT0585 & IT0586 Not Updated with AFY Active |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 20.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 22.03.2013 06:54:49 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Consider that you have activated Alternate Finacial Year (AFY) at your organization. When you try to create Section 80 and section 80C details through the IT Declaration solution of Employee Self Service (ESS) Portal, after approval, the Infotype Update Report for Advanced Claims(HINUINFU) report does not consistently update the master data. This results in the generation of an error message.
For Reference:
You have activated AFY at your organization. While you are trying to create Section 80 & Section 80C through ESS portal, IT0585 & IT0586 are not getting updated. This is happening since begin & end dates are entered as 01.03.XXXX and 28.02.XXXX through ESS, however in R/3 the dates are getting entered as 01.04.XXXX and 31.03.XXXX. As per the standard behavior, dates shall be entered as 01.04.XXXX and 31.03.XXXX through ESS as well.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1826422 |
| Topic | Jharkhand Professional Tax Reporting |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 25.02.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 21.03.2013 11:59:41 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
The act of Jharkhand Professional Tax has been introduced under which any person who is employed in that state is liable to pay professional tax.
Report to be delivered as part of standard solution is: FORM JPT-201
Jharkhand Professional Tax (JPT-201)is a quarterly report.
This report is used for quarterly and annual reporting of Professional Tax for state of Jharkhand.
Other terms
Jharkhand Professional Tax report, HINCPTX0 , India Professional Tax
reporting , PC00_M40_PTX – Professional Tax Reports, PCPTXIN4,PCSAPIN0 PCPTXIN1, PCEXTIN1, HR_IN_PTX_JH3_00, PCPTXIN6_PDF, T596F,
Reason and Prerequisites
The Act of Professional Tax for the state of Jharkhand has been introduced under which any person who is employed in that state is liable to pay professional tax. This is as per the legal change.
Solution
Apply the HR Support Package(s) indicated for your release in the ‘Reference to Support Packages’ section of this Note.
Note below points:
o Region code used for Jharkhand is ’34’.
o This Note provides changes related to reporting part of the solution.
o In challan details, you need to select the quarter and as per the requirement enter the challans detials to be displayed in the form layout.
o The views V_T7INP1 and V_T7INP4 are needed to be customized as per the requirement.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1829292 |
| Topic | HINCPTX0: Inconsistent Basis Displayed for Tamil Nadu |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 14.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 21.03.2013 05:33:42 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While executing Professional tax report (HINCPTX0) for employees working in Tamil Nadu region, professional tax basis amount displayed is incorrect.
An employee is working in Tamil Nadu region & is eligible for professional tax deduction. However, when professional tax report is generated for such an employee for a period, the professional tax basis amount displayed is incorrect.
For reference:
An employee is working in Tamil Nadu and has ptax basis as INR 10,000. His professional tax has been deducted & now ptax report is being executed. If report is being run for period 04/2012 i.e. July 2012, then basis is shown as INR 40,000. This is incorrect. Since for ptax computation, basis of April to September is considered, same shall be displayed as basis in report also. Hence, INR 60,000 shall be displayed as ptax basis for above scenario.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1833739 |
| Topic | Tax Simplifier – Income from Other Sources and Payslips |
| Version | 4 |
| Valid since | 19.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 19.03.2013 08:59:03 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Consider that you are using the Tax Simplifier Statement application in the Employee-Self Services for your organization. Currently, when the value in the field Long Term Capital Gains of subtype Other Sources for IT0584, is not maintained, the data related to Income from Other Sources is appearing
incorrectly. Also, the name of the payslip attached to the form is incorrect for the months of January, February and March, if payslips are being derived from the Business Add In.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1832435 |
| Topic | E-Separation – Error while saving request |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 15.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 15.03.2013 10:55:32 |
| Priority | Correction with low priority |
Currently, when using the E-Separation solution in the Employee Self Service in your organization, if you try to create a separation request and save the same, then the system generates an error “No valid target content area found Message no. APB_FPM_CORE112 “
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1833034 |
| Topic | Tax Simplifier Statement – Additional Payments |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 12.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 15.03.2013 09:42:45 |
| Priority | Correction with low priority |
You use the Tax Simplifier Statement application in the Employee-Self services for your organization and you have provided additional payments option to
your employees. When you try to filter the additional payments by implementing the BAdI HRESSIN_FILTER_ADDPY,the BAdI is not getting triggered.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1813041 |
| Topic | Inconsistent Annual PTax calculation – Madhya Pradesh |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 07.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 14.03.2013 08:03:56 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
You are executing payroll driver program HINCALC0 (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees working in your organization in the region of Madhya Pradesh.
While you are executing payroll, it is observed that annual professional tax liability /422, is calculated incorrectly.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1820772 |
| Topic | Inconsistency in Professional tax amount deducted |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 07.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 14.03.2013 07:57:07 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
You are executing Payroll driver program HINCALC0 (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) to run payroll for employees working in your organization.
While you execute, the following inconsistencies are observed.
- For the employees working in the state of Jharkhand, the annual professional tax is not completely deducted in case the employee leaves in the middle of a financial year.
- In case of any adjustment to professional tax made by the wage type MP00, there is an inconsistency observed with the professional tax amount deducted. This happens irrespective of the professional tax state/region.
Note: If any custom wage type is being used besides standard wage type ‘MP00’, a custom PCR should be written to populate the payroll variable ‘MP00’ with the amount in custom wage type.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1830205 |
| Topic | Runtime Error in Payroll Execution for Negative Wage Type |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 13.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 13.03.2013 11:28:11 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing Payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC) for the employees working in your organization.
It is observed that employees for whom negative values are passed in the Adjustment Wage Type system gives the DUMP error.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1828675 |
| Topic | Form 16 Inconsistent when File Path of Tax details provided |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 13.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 13.03.2013 11:27:46 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Following inconsistency was observed while generating Form 16 (Tcode:PC00_M40_F16) for employees of your organization:
If you have provided the File Path of Tax details while executing the Form 16 at your organization, the Form 16 DETAILS OF TAX DEDUCTED AND DEPOSITED will be inconsistent when executed for multiple employees.
The Form 16 output will show consistent details for first employee, whereas for rest of the employees DETAILS OF TAX DEDUCTED AND DEPOSITED was not shown in Form 16 but Blank value was displayed which is inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1799853 |
| Topic | Claims report – Carry Forward error |
| Valid since | 08.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 11.03.2013 11:51:04 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing Claims status report HINCREMS (T-Code – PC00_M40_REMS) to view the claims status of employees working in your organization, the following inconsistencies were observed.
1. In case of claims with carry forward frequency of more than one month, the amount is being carried forward for future months if not claimed in any period. When balance amount is being claimed in certain period, the claimed amounts are being carried forward further. This is inconsistent, since amount once claimed should not be carried forward further
2. When the status report is run for past periods after the amounts being carried forward, there are repetitive numbers of entries. This is also been observed as inconsistent.
For reference
a) For certain reimbursements, carry forward frequency is ’11’. Employee has carried forward the amount for April & keeps carrying forward till February. Employee is currently in the month of March and whole amount is paid to him. Even after this, carried forward amount is being displayed in April month of next year as well.
b) For certain reimbursement, employee has carried forward the amount for April. Employee is currently in the month of August and still the amounts are not claimed. In this case, when the employee executes the status report for April, there are multiple carry forward entries. This is inconsistent
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1799089 |
| Topic | ECR: Header Details Not Displayed for Certain Fields |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 06.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 11.03.2013 08:51:58 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While downloading the Electronic Challan *** Return (Tcode: PC00_M40_EPF)file as a worksheet to local systems, the system does not displays certain headings.
You have generated Electronic Challan *** Return (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF)for employee’s provident fund organization and that you are downloading the generated file to local systems in worksheet format. However, after downloading, certain headings are not getting displayed
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1812451 |
| Topic | Form 24Q: Offcycle results not displayed consistently |
| Version | 4 |
| Valid since | 08.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 08.03.2013 10:45:17 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are exectuing t-code PC00_M40_F24Q for employees in your company.You have processed off-cycle payroll runs for the employee for some period.In the same period you have executed the off-cycle two times to make some payments to the employee.
In such a scenario you are using the payroll identifier to distinguish between the two offcycle runs for the same day payment. The challan mapping has been done for the employee, still when F24q report is executed all the results of the period are not displayed, for the particular quarter with offcycle runs.
In such scenario the results displayed are inconsistent in F24Q.
For Example:
1. You are using offcycle payroll type for some payments to be made in May period dated on 26.5.2012 using Wagetype X.
2. In the same period you want to run the offcycle twice on the same date,i.e., 26.05.2012
3. For the second offcycle run on the same day 31.05.2012 you are usingWagetype Y. In such scenario you want the second payroll run should have
separate record in the payroll cluster.
4. In such a scenario you enter ‘1’ in the payroll identifier to separate both the payroll runs, during the payroll is being processed.The second offcycle run is stored with an unique identifier for same day payment and generates a separate record for the same. By default for the first offcycle run ‘space’ is stored as an identifier.
5. Then the described example displays inconsistency in F24Q reporting.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1624556 |
| Topic | HINCPTX0: Error while generating form for Ptax West Bengal |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 08.03.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 08.03.2013 07:23:25 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You have executed the report HINCPTX0 (HR-India Professional tax reporting) for West Bengal state.
Once the ALV list is displayed with relevant PTax details, you are trying to view the Adobe layout using ‘PRINT FORM’ option. On trying to check ‘PRINT PREVIEW’, system throws a short dump
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1798064 |
| Topic | Form 16 Report – Text Changes |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 07.12.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 07.03.2013 13:41:47 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Change in Form 16 report texts.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1797915 |
| Topic | Labour Welfare Fund Report – Text changes |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 07.12.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 07.03.2013 13:41:12 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Change in Labour Welfare Fund report texts.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1797478 |
| Topic | Employee State Insurance Report – Text changes |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 06.12.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 07.03.2013 13:40:44 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Change in Employee State Insurance report texts
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1819723 |
| Topic | Professional Tax considers the last split of IT0007 splits |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 21.02.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 07.03.2013 12:04:10 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Your are executing payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees working in your organization.
On executing the payroll for employees, it is observed that the Professoinal Tax is inconsistent due to splits in Infotype 0007. System considers the last split and calculates the Ptax for the last split and not for the entire month, even if the employee is ellible for entire month.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1796692 |
| Topic | Provident Fund Report – Text changes |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 05.12.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 01.03.2013 08:55:06 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Change in Provident Fund report texts.
Code changes have been done in Provident Fund report for the above symptom.
These changes are available with the mentioned HR Support Package.
If you need these changes immediately then Apply the Correction Instructions attached with this Note
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1816695 |
| Topic | Variable DA amounts incorrectly calculated |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 12.02.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 28.02.2013 11:10:29 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Currently in the standard system, when you update dearness allowance details for employee (Using transaction PC00_M40_DAB), the system incorrectly calculates DA amount, in case you have enabled ‘Incremental CPI slab Based calculation’.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1799084 |
| Topic | /4MI Incorrect With Prev. Employment Profits & Perquisites |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 18.02.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 22.02.2013 08:59:39 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
In case, previous employment details are maintained for an employee through IT0580 (Previous Employment Details), the system incorrectly calculates monthly taxable income while executing payroll (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC).
Consider that you are executing payroll for an employee working in your organization. The employee has certain previous employment details maintained through infotype IT0580. Employee has certain Profits in lieu of salary u/s 17(3), perquisites u/s 17(2) & medical reimbursement components also in his previous employment. Hence, the same has been maintained in IT0580. In such a case, the computed monthly taxable income is incorrect.
Monthly Taxable Income should be calculated as follows:
[Total income on which tax is computed – previous employment gross salary – previous profits in lieu of salary u/s 17(3) previous perquisites u/s 17(2) + previous employment exemptions (under section10, PF contributed, professional tax, medical reimbursement)- already computed monthly taxable income (/4MI)] / number of remaining months
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1823633 |
| Topic | Professional Tax reporting inconsistent for Tamilnadu State |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 21.02.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 21.02.2013 11:42:30 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are using Tamil Nadu Profession Tax with Profession Tax region code as ’22’.
When you are executing the Profession Tax report for an employee who belongs to region Tamil Nadu, Professional Tax basis displayed in report output has inconsistency where as Profession Tax paid is consistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1808184 |
| Topic | ESS: Error in Maximum Loan Eligibility Check |
| Version | 4 |
| Valid since | 08.02.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 21.02.2013 11:41:55 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You have implemented Loan functionality through ESS. The maximum loan eligibility amount for an employee is calculated based on the wagetypes maintained in IT0008 (Basic Pay).
While calculating the maximum loan eligibility based on the non indirectly valuated wagetypes maintained in IT0008 (Basic Pay), the calculated eligibilty amount is inconsistent
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1812201 |
| Topic | Tamilnadu State Profession Tax reporting issue |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 23.01.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 11.02.2013 08:16:27 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are using TamilNadu Profession Tax with Profession Tax region code as ’22’. When you are executing the Profession Tax report for an employee who belongs to region TamilNadu, Prosession Tax basis displayed in report output has inconsistency where as Profession Tax paid is
consistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1812201 |
| Topic | ESS: IT Declaration Dump While Updating Infotype 0585 |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 23.01.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 25.01.2013 05:20:05 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are using Employee Self Service (ESS) based IT Declaration application for employees in your organization.
However, it is being observed that while updating infotype 0585 for Section 80 deductions approved requests, using report ‘HINUINFU’ system throws a dump ‘CX_HRPA_INVALID_BUFFER_STACK’.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1784876 |
| Topic | Inconsistent /A60 and /Z60 Formation |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 22.01.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 23.01.2013 11:01:03 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Consider that an organization follows the practice where retrospective payment and the tax on retroactively paid amount needs to be accounted
to the same company code ,which is then also submitted to Government by the same company code.
In such situations if an employee is withdrawn ( Employment status ‘0’) has a retro respective payment in spite of no company code change, the system generates /A60 wagetype.
This leads to inconsistency in the payroll results.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1807022 |
| Topic | Inconsistency in calculation of Jharkhand PTax |
| Version | 4 |
| Valid since | 21.01.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 22.01.2013 09:33:04 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing payroll driver HINCALC0 (Tcode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for employees working in your organization in the region of Jharkhand.
While you are executing payroll, following inconsistencies have been observed:
1. Annual professional tax liability /422, is calculated incorrectly.
2. Wagetypes being used for one-time payments are same for different regions. Due to this, these one-time payments, e.g. bonus, are being considered for professional basis formation of all the regions. This is incorrect. One-time payments are considered for professional tax basis formation only for certain regions.
Click for FAQ on Jharkhand Professional Tax
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1766013 |
| Topic | India ESS : Income Tax Declaration BAdI issue |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 18.01.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.01.2013 10:41:16 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are implementing ESS-Income Tax Declaration application and you are facing the below issue:
BAdI: HR_IN_ESS_ACTPROP (Actual and Proposed Column Visibility
You have implemented the above BAdI for enabling and disabling the actual and proposed amount column fields in the application.However even after implemention, the instance of the BAdI is not returned and hence the method READ_ACT_PRO_VIS is not executed.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1799751 |
| Topic | ESS: Advanced Claims approval scenario eligibility issue |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 17.01.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.01.2013 13:16:39 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are using advanced claims application in employee self service scenario for employees in your organization.
However, on the approver overview Screen, while loading the requests for approvers of the claim requests, the eligibility data is being fetched for all the reimbursement types which is resulting in reducing the performance of the application.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1804669 |
| Topic | HINCALC0 : Inconsistency in Section 89 calculations |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 17.01.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 17.01.2013 14:54:24 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing a cross Financial Year retroactive payroll run (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization.
On execution, it has been observed that Section 89 calculations are happening inconsistently.
Consider a case where an employee is being paid an arrear amount retrospectively for the year 2010. The difference between the original /416 amount and the /416 in the current run would form /616 in the difference table (DT). While section 89 calculation is processed, the previous retrospective payments for the same year are adjusted with the /616 in the current payroll run, which is not happening. This is found inconsistent
Note: This note is valid for SAP-HR release 4.7 only.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1790225 |
| Topic | Form 24Q: Change in column header text of ALV output |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 20.11.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Modification |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 17.01.2013 07:23:17 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Change in Form 24Q report output ALV column header text.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1792045 |
| Topic | Tamilnadu State Profession Tax reporting issue |
| Version | 5 |
| Valid since | 15.01.2013 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 15.01.2013 10:46:43 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are using TamilNadu Profession Tax with Profession Tax region code as ’22’. When you are executing the Profession Tax report for an employee who belongs to region TamilNadu, Prosession Tax basis displayed in report output has inconsistency where as Profession Tax paid is consistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1804729 |
| Topic | Form 27A : Organisation name displayed inconsistently |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 31.12.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 04.01.2013 11:20:04 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F24q for the employees of your company the Form 24q is generated for all of the employees.When you try to execute the F27A tab during reporting of F24Q the organisation name displayed on the Form 27A is incorrect.The organisation name gets truncated.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1785552 |
| Topic | Inconsistency in Loan eligiblity amount |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 29.11.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 12.12.2012 08:20:27 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are creating a loan for an employee from transaction ‘PA30’ in Loan infotype (IT0045).After inputing the necessary details in the screen, on press of ‘Enter’ button, you see that eligible loan amount is getting doubled everytime on press of ‘Enter’ button.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1782402 |
| Topic | Professional Tax reporting form for India |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 29.11.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 11.12.2012 04:43:05 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
India Professional Tax reporting form provides detailed information as per the statutory format required to submit the profession tax paid by the employees.
The system generates a list with the employees’ basic details corresponding to the form that is selected, where the details for “Employees Whose Monthly salary or wages are” is not displayed as per the slabs maintained.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1783287 |
| Topic | ESS IT Declaration: Restricting Only Valid Entries To Appear |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 20.11.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.11.2012 10:25:04 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
The Validity dates for each entry in V_T7INI8 should be properly maintained in V_T7INI9 & V_T77WWW_GAHLP for ‘Section 80’ scenario and
similarly for ‘Section 80 C’ for each investment code in T7INI3 the validity dates should be maintained consistently in V_T7INI4 and V_T77WWW_GAHLP
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1787974 |
| Topic | Salary Packaging: Change in message text on request screen |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 14.11.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.11.2012 04:51:09 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing T-Code ‘P16B’ for salary packaging.
As per the configuration in Feature ’16UPD’, when the return value is ‘X’, the request does not require an approval from manager.
However, while requesting the salary package, the information text ‘After you are sure that the package is assembled the way you want, please press REQUEST to request it from your manager‘ gets displayed on the screen.
Note: This change is only related to Payroll India (PY-IN)
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1767904 |
| Topic | Electronic Challan *** Return: Corrections |
| Version | 4 |
| Valid since | 19.11.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 19.11.2012 10:46:32 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While generating the Electronic Challan *** Return (Tcode: PC00_M40_EPF) for employee’s provident fund organization certain data on ECR is inconsistent.
You are generating Electronic Challan *** Return (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF) for employee’s provident fund organization. Following inconsistencies are observed:
- Employee Number is being displayed in the ‘Member ID’ field. This is incorrect. System must ideally display the employee’s PF account number in ‘Member ID’ field.
- When the system generates ECR for multiple employees, if any employee has certain number of ‘Non Contribution Period days’ (NCP Days), then all subsequent employees being processed after this employee would also have the same number of NCP days displayed on respective ECR.
- ‘Diff EPF and EPS Contribution (Due)’ & ‘Diff EPF and EPS Contribution (Rem)’ fields are displayed incorrectly.
- When ECR is downloaded to local systems in the form of worksheets, certain headings were not getting displayed.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1777366 |
| Topic | Inconsistency in Termination workbench report |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 19.10.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 07.11.2012 10:26:37 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Inconsistency in Termination workbench report HINCTER0.
When executing t-code PC00_M40_TERM, for employees in your company the report behaves inconsistent.
If multiple WageType’s are being updated via the report then the update of WageType is inconsistent. The records do not get updated in the IT0015 also.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1784863 |
| Topic | Inconsistent Sec 89 When Payroll Run For Multiple Employees |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 07.11.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 07.11.2012 10:21:07 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for multiple employees,if one of those employees has certain section 89 details, same details
are being displayed in the results of other employees as well.
Consider the scenario that regular payroll is being executed for multiple employees. One of these employees has certain income from previous year and tax. Also, one another employee has an off-cycle payroll run before the regular run in current period. As a result of this, the employee who has the off-cycle payroll run before regular run, is getting this income and tax amount and hence the income tax calculation for them is going wrong. This behavior is inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1772337 |
| Topic | Jharkhand Professional Tax |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 06.11.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Advance development |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 06.11.2012 12:25:24 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Professional Tax for the state of Jharkhand has been introduced in September 2012 w.e.f 30th January 2012. The professional tax liability is computed on an annual basis and the deduction by the employer happens on a monthly basis.
For Professional Tax computation, new slabs and corresponding
deduction amounts have been introduced by the Jharkhand Government. Professional Tax Basis is computed annually (using projection) every month and subsequently, Professional Tax deductions are made in each month. Professional Tax slab for Jharkhand are as follows:
—————————–|—————-|
|Annual Salary or Wages | Tax Per Year |
|—————————–|—————-|
| Upto 3,00,000 | Nil |
|—————————–|—————-|
| From 3,00,001 to 5,00,000 | 1200 |
|—————————–|—————-|
| From 5,00,001 to 8,00,001 | 1800 |
|—————————–|—————-|
| From 8,00,001 to 10,00,000 | 2100 |
|—————————–|—————-|
| Above 10,00,000 | 2500 |
|—————————–|—————-|
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1769693 |
| Topic | HINCALC0 : Employer’s NPS Exemption Calculation Inconsistent |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 27.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Advance development |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 29.10.2012 08:24:13 |
| Priority | Recommendations/additional info |
The Values in exemption Wage types /3I5 (Sec80CCD Employee deduction) and /3I6 (Sec80CCD Employer deduction) need to be rounded off to the nearest rupee.
In case of splits because of mid-month salary change for a period system must calculate NPS monthly contribution for each split independently and the total contribution for the month to be derived by adding all such splits
In case of arrear payments ‘/3FS’ (Employer NPS Monthly Contribution Amount) in retrospective calculation needs to be re-calculated and the value of the wage type need to be stored in the payroll cluster.Also the amount carried forward needs to be stored in the current month for reporting purpose.
One attachment is with this note for manual correction
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1751681 |
| Topic | Package Adjustment For India Specific Loans Infotype Objects |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 09.08.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 29.10.2012 08:23:45 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
1) Infotype 0045 has screen 2640 for displaying the slab rates for loan. Package “PCLO” which is the package for international loan functions holds screen 2640 & hence the same needs to be removed as it is not necessary anymore. Slab rates can be maintained and displayed in view V_T7INJ7.
2) Include MP0045_IN has been inserted in report MP004500 which is module pool report for Infotype 0045 (Loans) and belongs to package “PCLO”. This include has source code for calling screen 2640 for displaying slab rates for loans on click of overview button.Country specific include MP0045_IN should be removed from international module pool for loans MP004500.
3) Standard BAdI implementation HR_IN_LN_REPAYMENTPL & the corresponding implementation class CL_IM_HR_IN_LN_REPAYMENTPL for BAdI definition HRPY_LOAN_PAYMENTS was created in package “PCLO”. This implementation & the implementing class needs to be removed from the system.
4) BAdI implementation class such as CL_IM_HRPY_LOAN_PAYMENTS & CL_IM_HRPY_LN_REPAYMENT_PL have been kept in the system without any specific corresponding BAdI implementations and hence needs to be removed. Also the class package attributes are in “PCLO”.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1770268 |
| Topic | Professional Tax for Jharkhand |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 28.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Announcement of Legal Change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 29.09.2012 04:28:37 |
| Priority | Recommendations/additional info |
Announcement of Professional tax for the state of Jharkhand
SAP will be delivering the required changes in the system shortly. In the mean time customers are requested to handle the same manually for the month of September 2012 by using region code 34 for Jharkand and using the INPX rule.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1775115 |
| Topic | IT0585 inconsistent due to delimit of a particular record |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 16.10.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 19.10.2012 08:50:26 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
When IT0585 is edited to modify the already existing Contribution details then inconsistent details are displayed for a particular FY.
When a record is delimited from a certain period other records followed by the delimited record is not displayed consistently in IT0585 in Edit mode.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1774193 |
| Topic | Section 80CCG : Gross Total Income check |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 10.10.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 17.10.2012 12:50:43 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing Payroll driver program (T.code – PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for executing payroll for employees working in your organization, who has contributed towards Section 80CCG scheme.
While executing payroll, it is observed that employees gross salary income considered for the eligibility check is inconsistent.
Reason :Program error.
Prerequisites:SAP Note 1743285 to be implemented.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
|
Note Number |
1762530 |
| Topic | Monthly Taxable Income Incorrect With Prev. Employ. Details |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 10.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 15.10.2012 11:56:37 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
In case, previous employment details are maintained for an employee through IT0580 (Previous Employment Details), the system incorrectly calculates monthly taxable income while executing payroll (Tcode:PC00_M40_CALC).
Consider that you are executing payroll for an employee working in your organization. The employee has certain previous employment details maintained through infotype IT0580. Employee has certain exemption u/s 10,provident fund & professional tax components also in his previous employment. Hence, the same has been maintained in IT0580. In such a case, the computed monthly taxable income is incorrect.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1622625 |
| Topic | Leave Encashment Amount not Considered for HRA Calculations |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 08.10.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 08.10.2012 08:21:21 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
Leave encashment is the amount payable for the employee’s leave period, depending upon the leaves to his credit and his salary at the time of
termination of employment or at the time of encashing his leaves.
Employees can avail exemption on leave encashment amount on the basis of
minimum of 4 values:
– Exemption limit
– Payment received
– Average monthly salary for a predefined no. of months multiplied by a multiplication factor.
– Average monthly salary for a predefined no. of months multiplied by remaining no. of leaves (in months).
As per govt. rules, in case an employee claims for leave encashment during his tenure of service, payment received for it should be considered as taxable. Also, it subsequently gets considered while calculating HRA basis as well. However, on executing the payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) currently, payment amount is not being considered for forming HRA basis.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1765568 |
| Topic | Layout corrections for form 16 Script and PDF : 2012 |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 17.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Modification |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 26.09.2012 12:56:55 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
When you execute the T-code, PC00_M40_F16 for the employees of your company the Form 16 is generated for all of the employees.
This Note contains multiple corrections for Form 16 :
1. Layout issues of PDF format are corrected
2. Layout issues of Script format are corrected
3 Attachments are along with this Note
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1757684 |
| Topic | Kerala Panchayat Raj – Professional Tax |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 27.08.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal Change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 25.09.2012 14:05:00 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Currently system has provision for Professional tax for Kerala state under the region code 11. However as per the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act , each panchayat can have its own slab rates.
Hence a provision is provided in the system where it is possible to create region codes for different Panchayats where specific slab rates can be maintained.
1.Within Kerala state there can be multiple Panchayats and each will have its own slab rates. Keeping this in view we have provided an option to be able to configure new region codes in the system.
2.The calculation logic for Professional tax calculation is half yearly and for the first half of the year (April to September) calculation of professional tax is performed in July. If there is any additional tax is applicable the same is deducted in August / September for the first half year. For the second half (October to March) calculation of professional tax is performed in January. If there is any additional tax is applicable the same is deducted in February / March for the second half of the year.
3.If there is transfer among different Panchayats within Kerala the already Paid out Ptax will be adjusted for calculation of professional tax that employee has to final pay for the block of six months.
4.Slab rates for one new region code that will be configured in system are as follows Slab Half yearly income (Rs) Maximum half yearly tax (Rs)
1 from 12,000 to 17,999 120
2 from 18,000 to 29,999 180
3 from 30,000 to 44,999 300
4 from 45,000 to 59,999 450
5 from 60,000 to 74,999 600
6 from 75,000 to 99,999 750
7 from 1,00,000 to 1,24,999 1000
8 from 1 ,25,000 onwards 1250
Note : To activate this solution kindly consult your legal counsel.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1756064 |
| Topic | Tax paid by EE and ER to be mapped seperately |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 22.08.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal Change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 24.09.2012 07:05:06 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Tax paid by EE and ER to be mapped seperately using Challan Mapping report
Note: There is an attachment along with this Note about Mapping Utility Screen changes
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1755357 |
| Topic | PY-IN:INBTD – Off Cycle Bonus Payment for Sr. Citizens |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 20.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 24.09.2012 06:39:39 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are processing additional payments (Ex Bonus payment) in Off cycle payroll run and for Sr Citizens the income tax calculation is not consistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1755993 |
| Topic | Non contributing days is exceeding 999 for PF report |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 14.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 25.09.2012 04:37:19 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
Inconsistency in Annual PF report HINCEPN1
When executing t-code PC00_M40_PNY, a run time error is appearing in the same.
“Workdays of absence class” / Non contributing days is exceeding 999, However the maximum length of the field is 5 with 2 decimal place i.e. the maximum value it can contain is 999.99 but in this scenario it is exceeding 999 causing this run time error.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1759499 |
| Topic | PY-IN : TAN upload utility not selecting as per company code |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 20.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 24.09.2012 13:13:40 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
You are running TAN upload utility PC00_M40_UTAN and providing company code as one of the selection condition . System is also selecting the employee who do not belong to the company code provided in the selection screen.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1756887 |
| Topic | Form 16: Challan Details Inconsistent When AFY Activated |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 24.08.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 24.09.2012 05:06:10 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While generating Form 16 (TCode: PC00_M40_F16) for employees working in your organization challan details are inconsistent in case Alternate Financial year has been activated in the organization.
You have activated Alternate Financial Year in your organnization & executed the payroll for employees. You have even performed challan mapping for the all the periods of the financial year. However, on generating Form 16, challan details on form 16 are displayed inconsistently.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1732259 |
| Topi | E-Separation : Generic Changes |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 30.08.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Advance development |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 24.09.2012 06:39:39 |
| Priority | Correction with low priority |
New Features available for E-Separation Solution
You are using E-Separation solution for employees of your organization.
These are the new features being provided:
(1) In Due Clearance configuration, if the position is maintained, then the tasks are not getting triggered to the respective task owners
(2) Maintenance of Users and Position for Counselors, Approvers and Task Owners in production environment directly
(3) Starting of the Due Clearance stage depending on completion of Approval stage
(4) Starting of the Exit Interview stage depending on Approval and Due Clearance stages
(5) BAdI for validations of input on E-separation request creation/initiation screen
(6) BDC to update Infotype 0001(Organizational Assignment) in case of Separation, Pre-Separation and withdrawal actions
(7) Prefilling of the HR Exit Interview form with the data filled by the employee in case of sequential process
(8) In the SAP standard Due Clearance letter, task owner details are made available
(9) In the Approver Overview screen, the tab Approval verview has been renamed as Separation Request Approval
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1762793 |
| Topic | Form 16: Delimited Sections of Income Tax appears on Form 16 |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 10.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 21.09.2012 09:50:16 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.
On execution, the sections of Income Tax which are no longer valid for a particular financial year and have
been delimited in the system are still appearing on Form 16.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1762799 |
| Topic | E-Separation: Stage start time not as per configuration |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 13.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 21.09.2012 09:01:00 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are using E-Separation solution for employees of your organization.
However the system triggers the stage before the start time for that particular stage has been reached.
The stages are not getting triggered as per the configuration done in view V_T77WWW_EASTT.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1748145 |
| Topic | ESS: Tax Simplifier Statement Fiscal Year On Payroll Area |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 12.09.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 13.09.2012 06:26:54 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing Tax Simplifier Statement application for employees in your organization from Employee Self Service (ESS) scenario.
However it is being observed that the payroll data is not getting displayed consistently on the form as the financial year determination happens on the basis of fiscal year variant entry in table T001.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1739643 |
| Topic | Electronic Challan *** Return For Employee’s Provident Fund |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 20.08.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.08.2012 06:11:14 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
Employees’ Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) has launched online receipt of Electronic Challan *** Return (ECR) from April 2012. As per the EPFO notification, there is no need to submit other returns via Form 5/10/12A, 3A and 6A. . All EPF related data can now be uploaded in Electronic Challan *** Return (ECR) format, using internet services.
Employers are requested to register their establishments at the EPFO portal. The registered employers can upload the Electronic Return and the uploaded return data will be displayed through a digitally signed copy in PDF format. It will be available for printing also.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1749826 |
| Topic | PF No. Not Displayed In Overview After PF No. Length Change |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 17.08.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 17.08.2012 10:09:09 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
PF and pension account number length had been increased from 20 characters to 40 characters. However, while we take an overview of ‘Provident Fund Contribution’ details of an employee, PF and Pension number fields are not getting displayed consistently
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1743285 |
| Topic | Section 80CCG : Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Schema (RGESS) |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 16.08.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 16.08.2012 06:16:34 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
A new scheme called Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Scheme is proposed in the Union Budget 2012-13 to encourage flow of saving in financial instruments and improve the depths of domestic capital market
According to the Finance bill the newly inserted Section 80CCG provides deduction wef assessment year 2013-14 in respect of investment made under notified equity saving scheme.
The assessee’s gross total income does not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs and once invested in the Rajiv Gandhi Equity Saving Scheme the investor is locked-in for a period of 3 years from the date of acquisition in accordance with the above scheme.
Amount of deduction -The amount of deduction is at 50% of amount invested in equity shares. However, the amount of deduction under this provision cannot exceed Rs. 25,000. If any deduction is claimed by a taxpayer under this section in any year, he shall not be entitled to any deduction under this section for any subsequent year.
Withdrawal of deduction – If the assessee, after claiming the aforesaid deduction, fails to satisfy the above conditions, the deduction originally allowed shall be deemed to be the income of the assessee of the year in which default is committed.
There are certain manual steps you have to perform the details is in the attachment Section_80CCG.zip
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1744069 |
| Topic | Inconsistency in /6I2 calculation |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 20.07.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.07.2012 12:24:22 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing PC00_M40_CALC for the employees working in your organization, for whom Section 89 calculation is enabled.
In case of retrospective run across financial year, the value of /6I2 is found inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1739167 |
| Topic | /616 Inconsistent When Payroll Run For Multiple Employees |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 20.07.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.07.2012 12:42:02 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for multiple employees, if one of those employees has certain section 89 details, same details are being displayed in the results of other employees as well.
Payroll is being executed for multiple employees. One of these employees has certain previous year income and tax. As a result of this, some other employees are getting this income and tax amount and hence the income tax calculation for them is going wrong. This behavior is inconsistent
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1724071 |
| Topic | Inconsistent Tax Calculation when AFY switch is enabled |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 29.05.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.07.2012 07:15:17 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing payroll (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization with Alternate Financial Year switch enabled for all employees.
On executing payroll, it is observed that tax calculation is not happening consistently.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1717589 |
| Topic | Professional Tax Reporting (Bihar) – Changes |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 10.05.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.07.2012 06:43:06 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are executing the report (HINCPTX0) for generating Bihar Professional Tax Forms for your employees working in your organization.
While executing it is observed that the form layout alignment and Form header data are inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1707877 |
| Topic | Layout Corrections for Form 7 and Form 8 – Pension Reports |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 02.07.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 20.07.2012 06:43:29 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing Pension fund report (Tcode: PC00_M40_PNY) for the employees working in your organization to generate Form 7-FPF (Yearly report in detail for Exempted Establishment) and Form 8-FPF (yearly report for Exempted Establishment – 1971/95).
On executing the Form, it is observed that Form/s alignment is not displayed consistently. Also, ‘Reason for leaving’ and ‘Date of Leaving’ are not displayed consistently.
For manual steps two zip files is attached along with this note
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1737918 |
| Topic | Section 80CCG – Budget 2012-13 |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 04.07.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Announcement of Legal Change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 04.07.2012 09:28:22 |
| Priority | Recommendations/additional info |
A new scheme called Rajiv Gandhi Equity Savings scheme is proposed in the Union Budget 2012-13 to encourage flow of saving in financial instruments and improve the depths of domestic capital market.
This Legal change announcement note is being released to inform customers that SAP will be delivering this change in the month of August
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
|
Note Number |
1168955 |
| Topic | PY-IN – Document changes |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 13.05.2008 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 10.07.2012 07:37:26 |
| Priority | Correction with low priority |
Document changes related to Payroll India
Textual changes related to India payroll functionality have been delivered.
To get these changes, implement the relevant HRSP mentioned in the note
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1725211 |
| Topic | AFY : Amount was not calculated as per the Slabs maintained |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 01.06.20122 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 10.07.2012 05:55:53 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
You are executing the payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC) for an employee.
On execution when AFY (Alternate Financial Year) switch is active,Tax amount is not getting calcuated consistently as per the Slabs maintained.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1732447 |
| Topic | Monthly Car & Conveyance Amount Not Calculated Consistently |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 06.07.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 09.07.2012 07:39:35 |
| Priority | Correction with medium priority |
While executing payroll (TCode: PC00_M40_CALC) for employees working in your organization, the system does not calculate monthly conveyance allowance paid to the employee consistently.
You are executing payroll for employees of your organization who have certain amount paid as car and conveyance allowance. After payroll has been executed, car & conveyance allowance is not getting reflected in the relevant wage type consistently
Employee is being paid INR 1500 per month as car & conveyance allowance. Employee is eligible for a maximum of INR 800 (per month) as conveyance exemption. Once payroll is executed, car & conveyance allowance is getting reduced to INR 800. This is incorrect. Car & conveyance allowance amount should be calculated as INR 1500.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1713493 |
| Topic | Deferred Interest: For multiple loans |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 29.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 02.07.2012 04:51:29 |
| Priority | Correction with high priority |
You are using the Deferred loan functionality and have multiple loans for an employee. Some of the loans are marked as deferred loan in tableT7INJ1. While running payroll /LID- Interest due is not calculated correctly and the wage type /LIA is not formed correctly.
Also wage type /LIA- Interest accumulated is not formed for new employees (New Hire).
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1731727 |
| Topic | NPS : Rounding off employer’s monthly contribution amount |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 19.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Legal Change |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 28.06.2012 12:54:34 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
You are executing payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization who are eligible for new pension scheme
having Provident Fund Contribution infotype (IT0587) maintained accordingly.
On executing the payroll, it is observed that the employer’s monthly contribution amount towards new pension scheme is not getting rounded off to nearest rupee.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1727170 |
| Topic | ESS: Section 80 & 80C deduction date issue for new hires |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 27.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 28.06.2012 12:54:11 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
You are using “Section 80 Deductions” and “Section 80 C Deductions” application under “Benefits & Payments” tab in Employee self service (ESS) scenario.
However it is being observed that for employees who are hired in the middle of the financial year, the updation of the infotypes 585(Section 80 deductions) and 0586(Section 80c deductions) is not happening properly.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1734563 |
| Topic | Finance Bill 2012: Section 80CCF not valid from FY 2012-2013 |
| Version | 1 |
| Valid since | 26.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 26.06.2012 13:01:54 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
Finance bill 2012 has been assented and as per the bill, deduction under Section 80CCF ( Contribution to Long Term Infrastructure Bonds ) of income tax has now been discontinued starting financial year 2012-2013.
Manual correction steps attached along with this note
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1727139 |
| Topic | HINCF24Q: Mid hire Ee’s not reported during period of hiring |
| Version | 4 |
| Valid since | 26.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 26.06.2012 04:44:56 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
You are executing Form 24Q (TCode:PC00_M40_F24Q) for the employees working in your organization.
In case the employee is re-hired during middle of a month in a FY with only one split present in the payroll cluster, Form 24Q does not display consistent results on execution for the employee.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1730257 |
| Topic | E-Separation: Department task owners mail not triggering |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 18.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.06.2012 09:08:31 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
You are using E-Separation solution for employees of your organization.
However when due clearance stage is initiated on execution of infotype update report for E-Separation (HINUEATP) it is being observed that intimation & reminder mails are not getting triggered to all relevant task owner’s of departments as configured in the system.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1727550 |
| Topic | HINCPTX0:Slab range not visible on PTax form for Maharasthra |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 18.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.06.2012 09:08:50 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
You have executed the report HINCPTX0 (HR-India Professional tax reporting) for Maharashtra state region.
Once the ALV list is displayed with relevant Professional Tax details, you are trying to view the Adobe layout (PDF) using ‘PRINT FORM’ option. However while generating the form the slab range is not appearing on Form 3.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1722690 |
| Topic | Inconsistent value of Perquisite in Form 16 under Form 12BA |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 18.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.06.2012 06:21:03 |
| Priority | Correction with High priority |
You are executing Form 16 (TCode:PC00_M40_F16) for the employees working in your organization.
However, while generating the form, the value of perquisite under section 17(2) in part B and total value of perquisites under form No.12BA are not getting displayed consistently.
Note : This SAP note is applicable for releases 4.7 and 4.6C only.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1665182 |
| Topic | PY-IN: Form 217(2A) – No Payroll Results Available |
| Version | 3 |
| Valid since | 18.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 18.06.2012 06:14:32 |
| Priority | Correction with High priority |
You are executing the Form 217(2A) report.While executing the report,you are getting a pop up message saying that “No Payroll Results available for employee/employees selected for this criteria”.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1712721 |
| Topic | Professional Tax Block is inconsistent for multiple F16 |
| Version | 2 |
| Valid since | 11.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 14.06.2012 04:48:44 |
| Priority | Correction with High priority |
The multiple form 16 switch is active and you are executing payroll for an employee who belongs to a state where professional tax is not monthly (example Tamilnadu). System is not calculating the professional tax basis inconsistently for the second half of the year.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number | 1720788 |
| Topic | Form16:Fiscal Year Dates for AFY , Annexure-B & Perk |
| Version | 5 |
| Valid since | 11.06.2012 |
| Reason and Prerequisites | Program Error |
| Release Status | Released for Customer |
| Released on | 14.06.2012 04:48:09 |
| Priority | Correction with Medium priority |
Following inconsistencies are observed while generating Form 16 (Tcode: PC00_M40_F16) for employees of your oranization:
1. Payroll has been processed for an employee for different months and tax is deducted for the months. You have only mapped the challan for few months. In such a case the last month with mapped challan details is getting populated for the rest of the months for which payroll is processed and tax is deducted.
Payroll is processed for 01 to 06 period and each period has tax deduction. However the challan mapping is done only for 01 and 02 period. In such case, in form 16 period 03 to 06 also is populated with May challan details.
2. Payroll has been processed for an employee for a Financial Year. You have implemented AFY solution at your organization. While you are generating Form 16 for such an employee, Form 16 is not displayed. This happens because if FY for which Form 16 is being generated is not a leap year FY end date is taken as 29.02.XXXX.
3. Payroll has been processed for an employee for a Financial Year. When an employee has been rehired, the Perquisite amounts in Form 12BA in Form 16 has been found inconsistent.
You have activated AFY at your organization. You are generating Form 16 of an employee for FY 2012-2013. In this case, FY dates shall come as 01.03.2012 to 28.02.2013. However, end date is picked up as 29.02.2013 which is inconsistent.
Courtesy SAP
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
| Note Number |