Skip to Content
Author's profile photo Bala Prabahar


I’m confused.

On the one hand, I concur with SAP that the customers need HANA. Since SAP’s officers meet several customers and discuss the business challenges with them every day, SAP knows a lot more about the customers’ needs.

On the other hand(1), over a period of several years, I’ve heard comments like “add more CPU, memory and other resources because they’re cheap” to address the performance issues. Instead of addressing the root cause, several if not all customers tried to mask data, design and programming issues. I’ve even seen customers adding more application servers and/or more dialog+batch processes when the database was causing the performance issues. Needless to say, adding more servers/processes in this case would only aggravate the problem when DB is not tuned appropriately.

On the other hand(2), I happened to read this article:

Speed, data volume and Technology were not the issues. Yet it took more than 15 minutes to communicate a simple truth if someone was alive or not. More embarrassing was the fact that several news organizations including Reuters, NPR, CNN etc have already broadcasted that the person was dead. What did go wrong? Definitely not speed, data volume or lack of technology;IMO, data quality, chaos and confusion were the reasons why wrong information was broadcasted. What would HANA address? Speed, data volume and technology. Would HANA address the data quality or chaos or confusion that would ensue from real time data analysis?

On the other hand(3), I read this article:

On Dec 13th, SAP pre-announced Fourth-Quarter results. It took 13 days to pre-announce the results. Did it take 13 days due to the lack of HANA or because CI(Converged Intelligence, I read this in Vitaliy’s blog Vital Outlook of 2011: Speculations for SAP BI Professionals) doesn’t include HI (Human Intelligence)?

On the other hand(4), didn’t we try to use more than required before? Let us take, for example, automobiles. Buying SUV’s used to be very popular because there was a perception that gas was cheap. Almost no one thought about future generations. Today almost all communities(including the US) talk about saving gas for future generations. Water and power are other resources that we tried to overuse in the US. Today we’ve started taking measures to conserve water and power. Does anyone think overuse of gas/water/power any different from overuse of computing resources such as disk, memory, CPU etc? When we use more than needed, aren’t we using more natural resources to manufacture them and generate more garbage? And what we’ll do with old servers when everyone starts using HANA? Recycle them?

Is HANA really an innovation? or would developing an innovative approach to use what we’ve today be considered innovation?

I’m confused.

Assigned Tags

      You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.
      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member
      For this blog any tag other than 'Ranting' is a disservice to the audience here.

      The echo-chamber of Noun-Verb-HANA commentators is getting stale real fast.

      There is a misreporting in news and you want to talk about it - fine.
      You have opinion about HANA and talk about it - fine.
      You want to imply there is something to learn from first about the other - that would be an EPIC FAIL, no matter how fine a pretzel you make of your logic and deduction.

      Author's profile photo Bala Prabahar
      Bala Prabahar
      Blog Post Author
      The link between "misreporting in news" and HANA was obvious I presumed. Misreporting in the business organizations occur on a regular basis. And the probability of misreporting is high on current data of few hours/days older then real-time data. 
      Author's profile photo Former Member
      Former Member
      Dear Bala
      I can follow you a long way here. Technology is not the key to success but it’s a tool among others. But when you say “SAP” you also say “technology”. SAP is buying, developing and selling technology that’s what they do. I believe it’s hard to blame a sales person that she’s trying to sell the product, but you as a customer must as always try to find out if you need the product or if it’s all hype.

      With Kind Regards
      Kristian Appel