Skip to Content
Author's profile photo Former Member

SAP Implementation Partner or Company Selection Criteria

Organization Change Management and Vendor Selection

Project success depends on an implementation partner’s ability to ensure business transformation occurs.


Can the SAP implementation partner or company deliver business process engineering together WITH the new system? Or, as with so many of them, do they just install systems and call that an implementation?


Lately I’ve been focused on developing a solid and repeatable ERP software and vendor selection process. 


While reviewing the academic literature and reflecting on my time working with SAP (since 1994) I found an interesting study from Romania.  The study addressed software vendor selection criteria and methods related to the limited information they had within the country.  The opening abstract certainly lines up with my personal experience about whether or not you will ever see ROI from your software investment:


Successful implementation of an ERP system is the result of knowledgeable and dedicated people working together. It entails 1) company-wide commitment, 2) openness to change, 3) good planning and 4) experienced guidance.


These key ERP implementation success criteria help you realize significant return on investment (ROI) from an ERP system. Using these criteria as guidelines during the system selection process and subsequent implementation can ensure that the chosen system will support and enable the business improvements many SAP implementation partners claim during the sales process (Hurbean 2009, pg. 1).


SAP or ERP Software Installation or Implementation?


There is a lot of substance to this study, for example it notes that the software implementation strategy and methodology are critical success factors for both the project and the software vendor selection.  One of the important differences they identified for ERP or SAP implementation companies is the idea of companies that merely install the application (more of a technical exercise) and companies that implement the software (focus on business drivers and business change in addition to the technical exercise).


The point of failure for many software vendor selection processes is a focus on the “product features” and “less or not at all the implementation.”


This study reaches the conclusion I have been pointing out for a long time on this site; there is a significant difference between software installation (with “technicians”) and software implementation (with “experts”) (see CRM, ERP, BI, and IT Investment — Where Do You Find the Business Benefit?). 


The Romanian study provides a meaningful definition between the two “goal posts” of software implementation methods and processes (see Software Engineering or Business Process Engineering?).  The goal of a software installation is to move from one software system to another with a minimum of disruption. An implementation focuses on the business drivers and business goals through a transformation of processes with the right software (paraphrased from Hurbean 2009, pg. 2) and the right implementation partner.


Key Implementation Success Factors that Apply to the Type of ERP or SAP Implementation Company or Partner


The key vendor factors identifying the differences between an implementation and an installation were:


  1. Lack of training and education to the company (typically a part of the change management process)
  2. Lack of in house expertise (related to a knowledge transfer strategy)
  3. Lack of clear goals or business objectives (poor business to IT alignment)
  4. Lack of companywide support and involvement (change resistance – insufficient change management)
  5. Lack of top management commitment and support (critical success factors and the senior leadership imprint)
  6. Lack of data accuracy.


Only items 3 (goals and business objectives) and 5 (top management involvement) are directly dependent on the company who selects the ERP implementation partner.  And even those two items can be strongly influenced by an ethical SAP implementation company.  For item #5 I have been on a few projects where the vendor project manager refused to engage company leadership even though the leadership was more than willing to step up but just needed some guidance.  And for item #3 I have seen many implementation vendors who bring unqualified “con”sultants to a project who were incapable of helping a company align an SAP implementation to business goals and drivers.  And then I have seen companies where the internal political culture or the company project team prevented these two success criteria.  The Top 5 ERP Success Factors by Project Stage from 22 Critical Success Factors is about another study I reviewed and wrote about which lines up with several of these key SAP implementation success criteria.


SAP or ERP Implementation Success Criteria


The study continues to provide some great insight into corrective actions that can be taken to ensure you more properly align your IT / ERP / SAP investment to your business goals and objectives.  They provided an overview of ERP implementation partner or implementation company selection criteria that helps to ensure SAP project success.  This site has addressed these key shortcomings in much detail.  Below you will see the numbered problem area from the list above, a summary explanation of how to address it, and then an in depth article on the topic or subject. 


  1. Lack of training and education – ensure you have carefully considered both knowledge transfer and training requirements (see e.g. Change Management and Knowledge Transfer for a Successful SAP Project)
  2. Lack of in house expertise – knowledge transfer and the best business employees to support your implementation efforts (see ERP Consultants: Is the Promise of Knowledge Transfer just part of the Sales Pitch?)
  3. Lack of clear goals or objectives – if the project requirements are not carefully aligned to business needs even before you begin you will have trouble finding value and finding the right vendor (see e.g. Aligning SAP Scope to Meaningful Business Requirements and Business and IT Alignment – Integrating Technology and IT Spend with Business).
  4. Lack of companywide support and involvement – a solid change management focus and communication are critical which requires software implementation vendors who can help lead the change activities (see Leading Change (and Change Management)).
  5. Lack of top management commitment and support – senior leadership must be educated as to the business benefit and the business direction of the project, and the importance of their strategic imprint for success (see The Real Reason Executive Participation Creates IT Project Success).
  6. Lack of data accuracy – ensure that your vendors focuses on the right data migration strategy and using the right data transformation tools (see Planning For a Smooth SAP Go-Live: Part 2).

Doing the up front work to carefully understand your business requirements, and then to demand that an SAP implementation company or partner has the skilled and experienced consultants is critical to project success.



Hurbean, L. (2009). Factors influencing ERP projects success in the vendor selection process.  West University from Timisoara (Romania), MPRA Paper No. 14430, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.



Note:  This post has been split into two key parts, this first part focuses on a review of the study and the second part More on Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods for ERP Project Success focuses on some specific methods or approaches for vendor selection.

Assigned Tags

      You must be Logged on to comment or reply to a post.
      Author's profile photo Witalij Rudnicki
      Witalij Rudnicki
      ... SAP Consulting should always be chosen as implementation partner? 😉
      Author's profile photo Bill Wood
      Bill Wood
      No, not at all.  It just means that customers should become much more sophisticated...

      Customers who choose to implement SAP software should be able to get the best possible SAP integrator and consultants they can.  Why should customers waste their money on consultants who can not help them implement the software in a way that helps them improve their business?