The primary objective of using local processing in the AAE is to increase the performance of message processing by eliminating the need for the ABAP stack during the process. By bypassing the ABAP stack, the message processing will still keep the existing mapping, monitoring and support functionalities.
Since the ABAP stack no longer participates in the processing of messages, therefore, any functionality provided by ABAP will not be available when the Integrated Configurations option is selected for message processing.
A detail article of the step-by-step guide, as well as the benefits and limitations of using “Integrated Configurations” in PI 7.1’s AAE is available from:
How To: Configure Integrated Configurations in the Advanced Adapter Engine
Architecture
Runtime Picture: From…
To…
As the message flows only through the J2EE engine or the AAE would this mean that monitoring henceforth for these AAE messages would not be possible via the SXMB_MONI transaction?
Also the presentation attached had a option “Schema Validation” , it looks like the long needed demand of XI consultants is finally being met. Looking forward to hear from you on this feature as well.
As usual thanks for the blogs on PI 7.1 . They are providing us a insight on what to expect and how easy it would be.
Cheers,
Bhavesh
Yes, you are right.
The message cannot be monitored via SXMB_MONI. It will have to be monitored using the RWB’s Adapter Message Monitoring.
Regards,
Bill
I am currently assessing the performance feastures on PI 7.1 and I am wondering about an option to view the Performance of message processing in case of the Avanced Adapter Engine.
Do I understand the documentation correctly that this is currently not possible? Any workaround suggestions?
Thanks alot.
Mathias.
Why i am asking is i dont want to store the raw credit card data at any place in PI.
Thanks,
Srini
There is not. a single persistence is required for guaranteed delivery when system goes down. Without it, the sender’s msg will have to be resent.
Regards,
Bill
Our aim is to prevent the storage of a single field in the payload. Is it possible with this single persistance that we have a adapter module which takes the payload but while storing it should not store the value of a single field.
any suggestions would be appreciated
Thanks,
Srini
This is not possible. The persistence is for the original msg, so that restart of msg processing is possible to guaranteee delivery, e.g. after system went down.
You will have to encrypt the credit card info before sending it to the adapter.
Regards,
Bill
Our aim is to prevent the storage of a single field in the payload. Is it possible with this single persistance that we have a adapter module which takes the payload but while storing it should not store the value of a single field.
any suggestions would be appreciated
Thanks,
Srini
How To: Configure Integrated Configurations in the Advanced Adapter Engine is working fine…..
i am getting 404 error..it says The requested resource is not available.
It is hard to help w/o additional info. Can you provide more details, e.g.
Where is error coming from?
What are the sender and receiver?
Regards,
Bill
We all ready configured all the steps like the document show’s and we are getting the error “No RECEIVER COULD BE”.
thanks for your time.
Regards
Lionel
I assume the activation of the configuration is okay and the error is from runtime.
Make sure there is not a conflict with a receiver determination configuration which uses the same sender component and interface as the AAE’s integrated configuration.
Have you checked for errors in RWB for: Message Monitoring and comm chan monitoring?
Regards,
Bill
The link above should be corrected.
Just in case, the link is:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/how-to-guides-rig-official/nw7.1/soa%20middleware/service%20bus/how%20to%20configure%20integrated%20configurations%20in%20the%20advanced%20adapter%20engine%20(NW7.1).pdf
Regards,
Bill
Can u refer any pdf’s which clearly provide the details on step by step basis for monitoring a scenario using AAE in RWB.
viji
AAE is just another name for adapter engine in PI 7.0. The tools to monitor AAE is no different than the tools to monitor adapters in PI 7.0.
The RWB is still used to monitor AAE in PI 7.1, e.g. message monitoring, comm chan monitoring, etc.
Regards,
Bill
Which features are in EhP1 for PI 7.1 regarding the AAE ?
Regards
Gerald
Normal method by using Performance i am able to test, but how to test the Advanced adapter engine scenario?
I am unable to test the Advanced adapter engine scenario by using performance monitoring, how to do it?
Thanks
Gabriel
Regards,
Bill
This might be a silly question.
For these AAE related interfaces, as we are not using Integration Server,does SAP charges the License fee same as normal third party to SAP data volumes ?
This question is for your account executive to answer.
PI now has a new licensing model, which is CPU-based. I do not know how this will affect existing customers based on number of messages. If based on number messages, I don’t think there is any difference whether the messages go thru IS or AAE.
Regards,
Bill
Recently we are facing an issue for the scenarios which are using advance adapter engine.
For the message which are more than 25 mB we are getting following error
‘Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service, failed to build seemessage object:’
During performance testing we have tested the scenarios for messages of size 100 mB.
If we change the scenario via Integaration engine messages pass successfully.
Is this some memory issue related to AAE?
Regards,
Hitesh
For AAE, the message pipeline is using the java not ABAP stack. Therefore, additional memory will be needed.
Can you increase the java heap memory for your PI system?
Regards,
Bill